Talk:Scientific method: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(Constructivist or not) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
--[[User:Zyacat|Zyacat]] |
--[[User:Zyacat|Zyacat]] |
||
== Constructivist or not == |
|||
First, I disagree that the scientific method is not constructivist. If the student is taught so that they apply the scientific method directly themselves, then it is constructivist. |
|||
If you wish to explain other methods for teaching science then feel free, but please keep it to other pages. This page should be reserved for explaining '''The Scientific Method''' in a constructivist context.--[[User:Memracom|Memracom]] 13:44, 19 February 2007 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 18:44, 19 February 2007
Scientific method or Scientifics methods ?
Hi,
This scientific method is the traditional method in science, but there are others methods in science more constructivists.
I'm student in science in education. So would you that I talk you about the others scientifics methods ?
--Zyacat
Constructivist or not
First, I disagree that the scientific method is not constructivist. If the student is taught so that they apply the scientific method directly themselves, then it is constructivist.
If you wish to explain other methods for teaching science then feel free, but please keep it to other pages. This page should be reserved for explaining The Scientific Method in a constructivist context.--Memracom 13:44, 19 February 2007 (EST)