Talk:Font Common Room: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Table of scripts.) |
(Added reply to personal comment.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is the area for dicsussions of the [[Font Common Room]] page. |
This is the area for dicsussions of the [[Font Common Room]] page. |
||
''General Note'': Most (if not all) of the people involved in these pages they do so out of their free time and because they enjoy doing it. It's fun. These pages are being developed and are work in progress. If you have a comment, make it in a civilised and modern manner. |
''General Note'': Most (if not all) of the people involved in these pages they do so out of their free time and because they enjoy doing it. It's fun. These pages are being developed and are work in progress. If you have a comment, make it in a civilised and modern manner. Read more about [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki what a Wiki is]. |
||
The following paragraph was moved here from the [[Font Common Room]] page. It |
The following paragraph was moved here from the [[Font Common Room]] page. It refers to the section that talks about fontconfig (sans, serif, monospace), etc. |
||
:This entire discussion seems to be ignorant of the development work that has been done, outside of the Linux community, in developping Unicode fonts. The prime example is [http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&item_id=Gentium Gentium] which covers most of the scripts needed. Any work in improving coverage should add glyphs to existing Unicode fonts like Gentium. Also, please not that concepts such as sans, serif and monospace do not exist at all in many of the world's scripts. Most scripts also do not have upper/lower case distinctions. |
:This entire discussion seems to be ignorant of the development work that has been done, outside of the Linux community, in developping Unicode fonts. The prime example is [http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&item_id=Gentium Gentium] which covers most of the scripts needed. Any work in improving coverage should add glyphs to existing Unicode fonts like Gentium. Also, please not that concepts such as sans, serif and monospace do not exist at all in many of the world's scripts. Most scripts also do not have upper/lower case distinctions. |
||
:Please spent your time constructively in enhancing the page to properly cover non-Latin scripts. [[User:Simosx|Simosx]] 14:51, 1 June 2006 (EDT) |
|||
=== Work in progress === |
=== Work in progress === |
Revision as of 18:51, 1 June 2006
This is the area for dicsussions of the Font Common Room page.
General Note: Most (if not all) of the people involved in these pages they do so out of their free time and because they enjoy doing it. It's fun. These pages are being developed and are work in progress. If you have a comment, make it in a civilised and modern manner. Read more about what a Wiki is.
The following paragraph was moved here from the Font Common Room page. It refers to the section that talks about fontconfig (sans, serif, monospace), etc.
- This entire discussion seems to be ignorant of the development work that has been done, outside of the Linux community, in developping Unicode fonts. The prime example is Gentium which covers most of the scripts needed. Any work in improving coverage should add glyphs to existing Unicode fonts like Gentium. Also, please not that concepts such as sans, serif and monospace do not exist at all in many of the world's scripts. Most scripts also do not have upper/lower case distinctions.
- Please spent your time constructively in enhancing the page to properly cover non-Latin scripts. Simosx 14:51, 1 June 2006 (EDT)
Work in progress
Below are some fragments that may make it in the front page.
Brazil | China | India | Nigeria | Thailand |
---|---|---|---|---|
Latin | Tibetan བོད་ཡིག, Simplified chinese 简体字 | Bengali, Devanagari, Gujarati, Gurmukhi, Kannada, Limbu, Malayalam, Oriya, Sinhala, Syloti Nagri, , Tamil, Telugu | Pannigerian | Thai |