Talk:Library.xml: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: do we want to duplicate library-level metadata? It's duplication, but allows traxking down the rest of the library from this xml file. just as finding the overall library .info file (fun...)
 
(metadata)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
do we want to duplicate library-level metadata? It's duplication, but allows traxking down the rest of the library from this xml file. just as finding the overall library .info file (funny that these have arbitrarily different extensions) allows you to track down the entire package, including this .xml metadata. [[User:Sj|Sj]] [[User talk:Sj|<font color="fc9"><small>talk</small></font>]] 19:28, 10 August 2007 (EDT)
do we want to duplicate library-level metadata? It's duplication, but allows traxking down the rest of the library from this xml file. just as finding the overall library .info file (funny that these have arbitrarily different extensions) allows you to track down the entire package, including this .xml metadata. [[User:Sj|Sj]] [[User talk:Sj|<font color="fc9"><small>talk</small></font>]] 19:28, 10 August 2007 (EDT)

Let's add metadata for discovery as well. This would include map / location data and category/keyword data per item. [[User:Sj|Sj]] [[User talk:Sj|<font color="fc9"><small>talk</small></font>]] 19:30, 10 August 2007 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 23:30, 10 August 2007

do we want to duplicate library-level metadata? It's duplication, but allows traxking down the rest of the library from this xml file. just as finding the overall library .info file (funny that these have arbitrarily different extensions) allows you to track down the entire package, including this .xml metadata. Sj talk 19:28, 10 August 2007 (EDT)

Let's add metadata for discovery as well. This would include map / location data and category/keyword data per item. Sj talk 19:30, 10 August 2007 (EDT)