Learning Learning/Parable 2/Insight: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Learning Learning/Parable 2/insight moved to Learning Learning/Parable 2/Insight: caps) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Insight: |
Insight: |
||
The logic of the Foobar story depends on accepting the analogy between “computers” and “writing.” This is an important insight that was not at all obvious in the early days of the computer presence and is still not obvious to everyone. Thinkers who have influenced my thinking about this are Alan Kay, Paulo Freire, Andrea diSessa and most recently James Paul Gee. (Google them.) |
The logic of the Foobar story depends on accepting the analogy between “computers” and “writing.” This is an important insight that was not at all obvious in the early days of the computer presence and is still not obvious to everyone. Thinkers who have influenced my thinking about this are Alan Kay, Paulo Freire, Andrea diSessa and most recently James Paul Gee. (Google them.) |
||
(Last sentence has been corrected: Perhaps by Freudian slip, I originally wrote "John Paul Gee" ....) |
(Last sentence has been corrected: Perhaps by Freudian slip, I originally wrote "John Paul Gee" ....) |
||
[[Learning Learning/Parable 2|Back to Parable]] | [[Learning Learning|Back to LL]] |
[[Learning Learning/Parable 2|Back to Parable]] | [[Learning Learning|Back to LL]] |
||
Revision as of 18:47, 26 June 2006
Insight:
The logic of the Foobar story depends on accepting the analogy between “computers” and “writing.” This is an important insight that was not at all obvious in the early days of the computer presence and is still not obvious to everyone. Thinkers who have influenced my thinking about this are Alan Kay, Paulo Freire, Andrea diSessa and most recently James Paul Gee. (Google them.)
(Last sentence has been corrected: Perhaps by Freudian slip, I originally wrote "John Paul Gee" ....)