User talk:JoshSeal: Difference between revisions
(Child Friendly Mouse Modifications) |
(Drawing wand) |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
[[User:AlbertCahalan|AlbertCahalan]] 18:03, 11 November 2007 (EST) |
[[User:AlbertCahalan|AlbertCahalan]] 18:03, 11 November 2007 (EST) |
||
== Drawing wand == |
|||
Hi Josh, I've left some ideas on the drawing wand peripherals page. regards. --[[User:Arjs|Arjs]] 08:30, 12 November 2007 (EST) |
Revision as of 13:30, 12 November 2007
You may talk to me here, but do check my userpage for other ways to contact me. Please remember to include a mechanism for me to contact you. Josh
<inputbox> type=comment default=User talk:JoshSeal width=12 height=10 buttonlabel=Peripheral Idea? bgcolor=#fffcf9 preload=Template: break=no editintro=Leave a comment for me with this one-field form. </inputbox>
Zdenek and friends
see User:ZdenekBroz/devices and leave him feedback. He'd love to encourage his friends who have these ideas; is a grad @ a university. Sj talk 13:28, 15 October 2007 (EDT)
signatures
Shortcuts : 3 tildes will sign your name; a fourth will add the date: ~~~~.
Child Friendly Mouse Modifications
First of all, the contributers section looked inappropriate. We sign things on talk pages, sure, and sometimes we point to authors of things, but... that part of that page looked like it was severely glorifying somebody who designed a mouse that might be nice.
Second of all, the problems are obvious. Just look at the picture in the PDF.
The whole page is suspect. It looks like an advertisement. Probably it should be deleted. OLPC does not exist to help some random inventor license his patent.
Do you know for a fact that OLPC is preparing the mouse for production, or that countries will be getting it for use with the laptops? If not, that's a big strong strike against the article existing at all.
AlbertCahalan 18:03, 11 November 2007 (EST)
Drawing wand
Hi Josh, I've left some ideas on the drawing wand peripherals page. regards. --Arjs 08:30, 12 November 2007 (EST)