User talk:Wmb@firmworks.com: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Questions from Forth Lesson 1)
(→‎Questions from Forth Lesson 1: was an unsigned comment)
Line 16: Line 16:
*Is there a forth which works with Sugar, i.e as a Sugar activity?
*Is there a forth which works with Sugar, i.e as a Sugar activity?
**No. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 10:18, 15 November 2007 (EST)
**No. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 10:18, 15 November 2007 (EST)
--86.135.8.160

Revision as of 15:23, 15 November 2007

recurse, yum

Hi! In lesson 4, I might have only used the definition of factorial that used the word 'recurse', and just skipped 'recursive'. 'recurse' is ever so much nicer, don't you think?

<Mitch> I don't have a strong opinion about recurse vs. recursive. Both get the job done.

Thanks for the awesome intro to forth!

<Mitch> You're welcome, glad you like it.

Questions from Forth Lesson 1

Lesson 1 does not have enough information:

  • What OLPC capabilities are accessible through forth?
  • Which capabilities are not accessible?
  • Is there a forth which works with Sugar, i.e as a Sugar activity?
    • No. --IanOsgood 10:18, 15 November 2007 (EST)

--86.135.8.160