Talk:Intellectual Property Rights and the OLPC laptop: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(bolioloacelr) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
zellirol |
|||
Intellectual property does not exist or at least is not conceptually well-defined and coherent. Any discussion predicated on the intellectual property meme is therefore bound to be useless. Consistent with the foregoing premise, this article is useless. [[User:209.30.160.174|209.30.160.174]] 15:47, 19 February 2007 (EST) |
Intellectual property does not exist or at least is not conceptually well-defined and coherent. Any discussion predicated on the intellectual property meme is therefore bound to be useless. Consistent with the foregoing premise, this article is useless. [[User:209.30.160.174|209.30.160.174]] 15:47, 19 February 2007 (EST) |
||
Revision as of 03:22, 25 January 2008
zellirol Intellectual property does not exist or at least is not conceptually well-defined and coherent. Any discussion predicated on the intellectual property meme is therefore bound to be useless. Consistent with the foregoing premise, this article is useless. 209.30.160.174 15:47, 19 February 2007 (EST)
My name is Hunter I do not give any permission for any of my seen or unseen Open Source Input to be used in this way under any of my usage platforms. My programs are free to any one and cannot with out my permission be used in this way. I have put a block code on all sources from 1995 to present. If you find this effects your plan get in touch at bakerdz at OLPC. Thanks Hunter July 18,2007