Talk:Electronic textbook projects: Difference between revisions
HSTutorials (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(Suggested merging of this page and 'sharing your content') |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Overlap''' |
|||
There seems be a significant overlap between the contents of this page and that of [[Sharing_your_content_with_the_OLPC_project]]. Merging them should be considered. [[User:Lethe|Lethe]] |
|||
'''Mathematics might be the most important and easiest (relatively) series of textbooks to create.''' |
'''Mathematics might be the most important and easiest (relatively) series of textbooks to create.''' |
||
Revision as of 11:52, 11 September 2006
Overlap
There seems be a significant overlap between the contents of this page and that of Sharing_your_content_with_the_OLPC_project. Merging them should be considered. Lethe
Mathematics might be the most important and easiest (relatively) series of textbooks to create.
Here's why:
1) Most content can be taken from existing textbooks without copyright infringement issues (no one owns 3x + 7 = 12)
2) The organization of the textbook is straight-forward
2) It's the easiest subject to study in a non-primary language because there's not that much vocabulary (compared to other subjects), and mathematical symbols don't need translation. In US schools, math classes are the first mainstream classes ESL students are given.
3) Word problems, which obviously can't be taken from existing textbooks, could be authored in a Wikipedia fashon.
We live in very exciting times. Many math teachers have wished that they could make changes to, or contribute to, the math book they use. A project like this makes that possible, with the added benefit of providing our expert help to people in need across the world. How cool is that!?! --HSTutorials 12:17, 20 July 2006 (EDT)