XS Roadmap: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (+cat)
Line 68: Line 68:


''Note:'' Old releases go to the [[XS_Changelog]]
''Note:'' Old releases go to the [[XS_Changelog]]


[[category:SchoolServer]]

Revision as of 20:01, 23 March 2008

  This page is monitored by the OLPC team.

Versioning Scheme

Releases will follow a <major>.<feature>.<minor> versioning scheme, as follows:

  • 2.0 is our long-term "Next Gen" release somewhere in the distance
  • 1.0 is our mid-term "we are proud of it - features and stability" release
  • 0.3 will be the first release managed by Martin Langhoff, to sync with Peru's April 2008 deployment
  • 0.2 is Build 160 by Wad.

If for example 0.2 needs bugfixes, we'll see a 0.2.1 release. The 0.9 to 1.0 transition will be about stability and polish.

Exactly what happens between 0.2 and 1.0 will be defined via release goals and blueprints (similar to Ubuntu's approach) which will be managed in dev.laptop.org .

Note: On dev.laptop.org our release names are prefixed with "xs-" so 1.0 is xs-1.0.

Release schedule

The XS should see a new feature release every 3~4 weeks until we hit v1.0. At that point we will encourage installations to switch to v1.0 and ensure the upgrades from earlier releases to 1.0 work smoothly. From 1.0 onwards the release cycle will be slower - probably about 4 months.

In calendar terms, we are very loosely talking about

  • 0.2 18th April 2008
  • 0.3 9th May 2008
  • 1.0 mid-November 2008
  • 1.1 March 2009

Upgradeability considerations

A key consideration is that once XS is widely installed, countries/regions will want to limit the number of upgrades they apply to the XS. During the 1.x cycle, we must support environments where the XS has a yearly upgrade. That means that with a 4-month cycle 1.0 must be able to upgrade to 1.4 smoothly.

Deployment managers need to be aware that XS with versions earlier than 1.0 can be managed in two ways:

  • Once 1.0 is ready, there will be a special upgrade procedure to get from 0.x to 1.0 with minimal steps.
  • Upgrading through each version.

Installations using 1.x will be expected to upgrade at least yearly.

Key metrics

When judging release goals, there are some key metrics we must consider (and are not always obvious):

  • A common scenario will be an unattended, unmanaged XS that only gets powered up and forgotten. Might have Internet/WAN access, but probably not. Are we improving/regressing the XS performance for that scenario?
  • How about the minimal configuration scenarios?

Release goals

1.0

  • features from 0.9
  • bufixes
  • upgrade path from any earlier 0.x release

0.?

Install web based activities (Moodle, Mediawiki) with identity mgmt (SSO) and Sugarised UIs. Initial XS DevKit toolset with tools to prepare the install image with additional content & software, like a slice of Wikipedia content, Moodle demo courses, etc.

0.2

Matches XO's "Update.1" release. Will be deployed in Peru - our first large-scale install of XSs, many of them with nil or spotty connectivity, so strong focus on install tools and manageability.

  • Backups
  • Install config
  • Security scheme
  • Manageability


Note: Old releases go to the XS_Changelog