XS Directory Layout: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: The base rule is to follow Debian's approach to LSB layout, called the [http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/fhs/fhs-2.3.html Filesystem Hierarchy Standard FHS] while we retain some...)
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The base rule is to follow Debian's approach to LSB layout, called the [http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/fhs/fhs-2.3.html Filesystem Hierarchy Standard FHS] while we retain some freedom to override FHS where it makes sense. Overall, this means that
The base rule is to follow Debian's approach to LSB layout, called the [http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/fhs/fhs-2.3.html Filesystem Hierarchy Standard FHS] while we retain some freedom to override FHS where it makes sense. In simple terms this means that


* Code should go to /usr (lib o bin)
* Code should go to /usr (lib o bin)

Revision as of 20:25, 24 March 2008

The base rule is to follow Debian's approach to LSB layout, called the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard FHS while we retain some freedom to override FHS where it makes sense. In simple terms this means that

  • Code should go to /usr (lib o bin)
  • Configuration must land in /etc
  • /var/lib is for permanent data storage (database files, for example)
  • The use /var/cache and /var/tmp should be obvious ;-)
  • Logs to /var/log
  • For webapps in scripting languages /var/www/<appname> can host the code, and http://<hostname>/<appname> will normally be the entry point

Language specific notes: