Talk:XO Austin: Difference between revisions
HarperReed (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
If you are interested, i would be willing to take over hosting this server. It would keep the same name or could be aus.tx.il.us.xochat.org. let me know your thoughts. |
If you are interested, i would be willing to take over hosting this server. It would keep the same name or could be aus.tx.il.us.xochat.org. let me know your thoughts. |
||
--[[User:HarperReed|HarperReed]] 23:40, 6 April 2008 (EDT) |
--[[User:HarperReed|HarperReed]] 23:40, 6 April 2008 (EDT) |
||
Its fine right now, as long as I remember to keep an eye on the Daemon, I don't mind it hanging off my server. Maybe it would be best to just start a midwest regional server and see how that works out. Too bad the XO neighborhood concept doesn't allow for multi-server and/or hierarchical structure. -[[User:Ericvh|Ericvh]] 16:31, 8 April 2008 (EDT) |
|||
Revision as of 20:31, 8 April 2008
Sign me up! -- PatrickTou 16:22, 3 January 2008 (EST)
Jabber server is now running, folks please try it out. I'll try and leave a qemu XO logged in to test against -- Ericvh 21:54, 9 January 2008 (EST)
I added this server to the Community Jabber Servers list. --HarperReed 03:36, 2 March 2008 (EST)
Regional server
If you are interested, i would be willing to take over hosting this server. It would keep the same name or could be aus.tx.il.us.xochat.org. let me know your thoughts. --HarperReed 23:40, 6 April 2008 (EDT)
Its fine right now, as long as I remember to keep an eye on the Daemon, I don't mind it hanging off my server. Maybe it would be best to just start a midwest regional server and see how that works out. Too bad the XO neighborhood concept doesn't allow for multi-server and/or hierarchical structure. -Ericvh 16:31, 8 April 2008 (EDT)