Trac ticket workflow

First draft

A approximate common path:

 code -> 
 package -> 
 add to build -> 
 test in build -> 
 qa signoff ->
 finalize

After testing, the developer tags the bug with the results, e.g.:

 joyride-2126:-    or   joyride-2126:+

I presume this is after the "test in build" state, which I presume means the developer who coded the fix tested it in a build. That could be clearer. Then, what does the developer do? Just set it to "qa signoff"? Assign it to some QA person? At what point does it get tagged into the 8.2 release stream, and should it be assigned to someone to ensure that? --morgs 09:59, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

The purpose of the finalize state is for the release team to provide any user-facing documentation or to conclude that no documentation is necessary.

The workflow can be exited early by resolving a ticket as 'worksforme', 'invalid', etc.

At various times, someone (e.g. the developer or the release team) may need an answer to a question. In this event, the ticket's next action should be set to 'communicate'.

Finally, the other 'next action' states can be used to describe ignorance about what sort of action is needed. The regular trac triage process will be responsible for pushing these tickets along.