Talk:OLPC myths: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
FazzMunkle (talk | contribs) |
FazzMunkle (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I added one more that I see a lot of. That of value judgements placed on this project simply because companies like Microsoft have come up with their own ideas.--[[User:FazzMunkle|FazzMunkle]] 14:21, 19 March 2006 (EST) |
I added one more that I see a lot of. That of value judgements placed on this project simply because companies like Microsoft have come up with their own ideas.--[[User:FazzMunkle|FazzMunkle]] 14:21, 19 March 2006 (EST) |
||
== The recycling myth/misunderstanding == |
== The recycling myth/misunderstanding entry == |
||
I figured it should be elaborated on and the original dealt with two distinct issues of recycling/disposability, one possibly answering the other. I hope I kept the original spirit of the entry.--[[User:FazzMunkle|FazzMunkle]] 11:21, 21 March 2006 (EST) |
I figured it should be elaborated on and the original dealt with two distinct issues of recycling/disposability, one possibly answering the other. I hope I kept the original spirit of the entry.--[[User:FazzMunkle|FazzMunkle]] 11:21, 21 March 2006 (EST) |
||
Revision as of 16:22, 21 March 2006
Just tightening up the wordings, clearing up potential misunderstandings and adding some entries
I added one more that I see a lot of. That of value judgements placed on this project simply because companies like Microsoft have come up with their own ideas.--FazzMunkle 14:21, 19 March 2006 (EST)
The recycling myth/misunderstanding entry
I figured it should be elaborated on and the original dealt with two distinct issues of recycling/disposability, one possibly answering the other. I hope I kept the original spirit of the entry.--FazzMunkle 11:21, 21 March 2006 (EST)