Ejabberd resource tests/try 5: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(Ejabberd test results, attempt 5) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Try 5: a few hundred users, interacting properly == |
|||
It turns out that in the hyperactivity agents were not interacting in |
It turns out that in the hyperactivity agents were not interacting in |
||
[[Ejabberd resource tests/try 4]]. |
[[Ejabberd resource tests/try 4]]. |
||
For this test several hyperactivity instances were used, each running 50 clients. 4 XO laptops were also connected, so the total number of clients was at most stages 50n + 4. |
|||
=== Memory use === |
|||
Here you can see the memory use is slightly over 1 MB per user, and growth is perhaps slightly more than linear. |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
=== Memory use vs connections === |
|||
This shows max-median-min values for stable points along the way. |
|||
[[Image:try5-resident_mem_min_per_conn-resident_mem_max_per_conn-resident_mem_median_per_conn.png]] |
[[Image:try5-resident_mem_min_per_conn-resident_mem_max_per_conn-resident_mem_median_per_conn.png]] |
||
⚫ | |||
=== CPU usage === |
|||
Cumulative CPU use by the ejabberd process: |
|||
⚫ | |||
Load averages, by connections and by time: |
|||
[[Image:try5-load_avg_5_min_per_conn-load_avg_5_max_per_conn-load_avg_5_median_per_conn.png]] |
[[Image:try5-load_avg_5_min_per_conn-load_avg_5_max_per_conn-load_avg_5_median_per_conn.png]] |
||
[[Image:load_avg_1-load_avg_5-load_avg_15.png]] |
|||
⚫ | |||
=== The laptops === |
|||
Note that they all see a different number of clients. |
|||
[[Image:try5-hyperactivity-3-800.jpg]] |
[[Image:try5-hyperactivity-3-800.jpg]] |
Revision as of 03:00, 4 November 2008
Try 5: a few hundred users, interacting properly
It turns out that in the hyperactivity agents were not interacting in Ejabberd resource tests/try 4.
For this test several hyperactivity instances were used, each running 50 clients. 4 XO laptops were also connected, so the total number of clients was at most stages 50n + 4.
Memory use
Here you can see the memory use is slightly over 1 MB per user, and growth is perhaps slightly more than linear.
Memory use vs connections
This shows max-median-min values for stable points along the way.
CPU usage
Cumulative CPU use by the ejabberd process:
Load averages, by connections and by time:
The laptops
Note that they all see a different number of clients.