User talk:Mark.Burnett: Difference between revisions
Mark.Burnett (talk | contribs) (→Plan) |
(→Plan) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Nice work on the deployment toolkit! You [[Improving the Deployment Toolkit#Plan|note]] that "the plan is maintained by Mark.Burnett We are aiming to complete this work by the end of November 2010." - can you include a link to that work, or is it private? --[[User:Sj|Sj]] [[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]] 12:51, 8 September 2010 (UTC) |
Nice work on the deployment toolkit! You [[Improving the Deployment Toolkit#Plan|note]] that "the plan is maintained by Mark.Burnett We are aiming to complete this work by the end of November 2010." - can you include a link to that work, or is it private? --[[User:Sj|Sj]] [[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]] 12:51, 8 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
::Thanks Sj. None of the work is private. We are working in the wiki to be as open and collaborative as possible so that people can get benefit from what we are doing straight away and also to make sure others get a chance to contribute or review our work. The plan itself is just an MS Project version of the [[Improving the Deployment Toolkit#Approach|Approach]], which I am developing at the moment. I'll put a high level version in the wiki showing key milestones once its complete. I also added references to all the new sections we will be creating in the [[Talk:Deployment_Guide#Improving the Deployment Toolkit|Deployment Guide talk page]] to invite discussion. --[[User:Mark.Burnett|Mark.Burnett]] 13:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC) |
::Thanks Sj. None of the work is private. We are working in the wiki to be as open and collaborative as possible so that people can get benefit from what we are doing straight away and also to make sure others get a chance to contribute or review our work. The plan itself is just an MS Project version of the [[Improving the Deployment Toolkit#Approach|Approach]], which I am developing at the moment. I'll put a high level version in the wiki showing key milestones once its complete. I also added references to all the new sections we will be creating in the [[Talk:Deployment_Guide#Improving the Deployment Toolkit|Deployment Guide talk page]] to invite discussion. --[[User:Mark.Burnett|Mark.Burnett]] 13:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Collab conundrum == |
|||
Often the responder posts to the questioner's talk page, out of politeness. For longer discussions, it's helpful to use liquid threads, an extension we could turn on - that should let you subscribe to a single thread. --[[User:Sj|Sj]] [[User talk:Sj|<font style="color:#f70; font-size:70%">talk</font>]] 16:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:26, 8 September 2010
If you'd like to talk about ways of improving the Deployment Guide or have suggestions for the project I'm working on to do that then please leave me a message below by clicking on the + above and I will get back to you as soon as I can. If you add three tilda's (~~~) to your note then it'll make it easier for me to see who you are and reply to you. Thanks!
Suggestion
PippaThomas 10:41, 8 September 2010 (UTC)Hello Mark, will there be links to the budget calculation tools in your Deployment Guide?
- Yes Pippa, we will be providing links to the new spreadsheets for download and also we will be updating the google doc version of the deployment guide. Mark.Burnett 10:47, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Plan
Nice work on the deployment toolkit! You note that "the plan is maintained by Mark.Burnett We are aiming to complete this work by the end of November 2010." - can you include a link to that work, or is it private? --Sj talk 12:51, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks Sj. None of the work is private. We are working in the wiki to be as open and collaborative as possible so that people can get benefit from what we are doing straight away and also to make sure others get a chance to contribute or review our work. The plan itself is just an MS Project version of the Approach, which I am developing at the moment. I'll put a high level version in the wiki showing key milestones once its complete. I also added references to all the new sections we will be creating in the Deployment Guide talk page to invite discussion. --Mark.Burnett 13:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Collab conundrum
Often the responder posts to the questioner's talk page, out of politeness. For longer discussions, it's helpful to use liquid threads, an extension we could turn on - that should let you subscribe to a single thread. --Sj talk 16:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)