Literacy Project/2012-05-02: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
; Data variance |
; Data variance |
||
DL - When I ran a filter over timestamps... the results seemed odd for week 6. Only 5% had bad timestamps. |
|||
: And week 4 had an order of magnitude fewer total records than the previous week |
: And week 4 had an order of magnitude fewer total records than the previous week |
||
Rachel - b/t week 5 and 6, we had a great increase (65%) of photos taken. |
Rachel - b/t week 5 and 6, we had a great increase (65%) of photos taken. |
||
; Blank camera files |
|||
DL - still the same % of black files (3/4); it still does this when the screen is covered or it's dark out. |
|||
RS - fewer pictures would cut the total data size in half, would make other crunching faster. |
|||
DN - I could cut the rate in half. |
|||
Revision as of 21:21, 2 May 2012
Notes
Angela C, David N, David L, Rachel, Richard, Sam
- Timestamps
- Timestamp problems: 4 sets of stamps; (s, ms) and (1970, 2012). Still unclear what's causing the reset; Richard leaves on the 10th.
- Process of gathering data
RS - I would walk each directory. while copying that, it takes forever; 3-4G. I rsynced the whole thing, so the archive is duplicated of what's on raw.
- No processing yet on week 6; just copied zip files into the raw directory.
- Data variance
DL - When I ran a filter over timestamps... the results seemed odd for week 6. Only 5% had bad timestamps.
- And week 4 had an order of magnitude fewer total records than the previous week
Rachel - b/t week 5 and 6, we had a great increase (65%) of photos taken.
- Blank camera files
DL - still the same % of black files (3/4); it still does this when the screen is covered or it's dark out.
RS - fewer pictures would cut the total data size in half, would make other crunching faster.
DN - I could cut the rate in half.
Summary of TinkrBook data analysis
Some summaries shared by Angela.
