Talk:How to Damage a FLASH Storage Device: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
PeasthopeOld (talk | contribs) m (Long file names and FAT16 vs. FAT32.) |
PeasthopeOld (talk | contribs) (→Flash storage-specific file systems: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Does a requirement for VFAT or long file names have a bearing on the choice of FAT16 vs. FAT32? Apparently both FAT can have long file names in Linux. Is there any subtle difficulty which needs mention? Thanks, ... [[User:Peasthope|Peasthope]] 19:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC) |
Does a requirement for VFAT or long file names have a bearing on the choice of FAT16 vs. FAT32? Apparently both FAT can have long file names in Linux. Is there any subtle difficulty which needs mention? Thanks, ... [[User:Peasthope|Peasthope]] 19:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Flash storage-specific file systems == |
|||
Striking that the article has no mention of a flash storage-specific file system. I would have thought that a primary recommendation is to use [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UBIFS UBIFS] rather than FAT or ext3. Regards, ... [[User:Peasthope|Peasthope]] 16:10, 13 March 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:10, 13 March 2013
FAT and long file names
Does a requirement for VFAT or long file names have a bearing on the choice of FAT16 vs. FAT32? Apparently both FAT can have long file names in Linux. Is there any subtle difficulty which needs mention? Thanks, ... Peasthope 19:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Flash storage-specific file systems
Striking that the article has no mention of a flash storage-specific file system. I would have thought that a primary recommendation is to use UBIFS rather than FAT or ext3. Regards, ... Peasthope 16:10, 13 March 2013 (UTC)