Talk:Font Common Room: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added comment on SVG, big font issue.) |
(Added comment on vague sentence in main document.) |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
* ''add here'' |
* ''add here'' |
||
The main text has the following in it: |
:The main text has the following in it: |
||
Scripts in Pilot Countries |
:Scripts in Pilot Countries |
||
Not to have included a font, for normal means that the laptop is not usable for the kids in the area the script is used. |
:Not to have included a font, for normal means that the laptop is not usable for the kids in the area the script is used. |
||
This is not a grammatical English sentence. What does it mean? What is the meaning of the list that follows the statement? Is it a good thing or a bad thing if a language is listed in the list? |
:This is not a grammatical English sentence. What does it mean? What is the meaning of the list that follows the statement? Is it a good thing or a bad thing if a language is listed in the list? |
||
:The quoted sentence requires rephrasing. See main document for a clarification (I am not sure who wrote the original). [[User:Simosx|Simosx]] 17:36, 1 June 2006 (EDT) |
Revision as of 21:36, 1 June 2006
This is the area for dicsussions of the Font Common Room page.
General Note: Most (if not all) of the people involved in these pages they do so out of their free time and because they enjoy doing it. It's fun. These pages are being developed and are work in progress. If you have a comment, make it in a civilised and modern manner. Read more about what a Wiki is.
The following paragraph was moved here from the Font Common Room page. It refers to the section that talks about fontconfig (sans, serif, monospace), etc.
- This entire discussion seems to be ignorant of the development work that has been done, outside of the Linux community, in developping Unicode fonts. The prime example is Gentium which covers most of the scripts needed. Any work in improving coverage should add glyphs to existing Unicode fonts like Gentium. Also, please not that concepts such as sans, serif and monospace do not exist at all in many of the world's scripts. Most scripts also do not have upper/lower case distinctions.
- Please spend your time constructively in enhancing the page to properly cover non-Latin scripts. Simosx 14:51, 1 June 2006 (EDT)
- Gentium is a well-known free font, licensed with the Open Font License. It is a Serif font that covers the full Latin Unicode block, which means it supports sufficiently Brazil and Nigeria. I do not know whether Gentium is hinted, which might be an issue when used for the User Interface. Simosx 15:00, 1 June 2006 (EDT)
- Additional fonts can be used by developers by converting font outlines to SVG format and using the SVG support in the OLPC to display them. It is a nice thing to have some font variety however, it is more important to have one font that covers all the glyphs used in the target languages.User:Memracom
- Are there any references to the SVG support in the OLPC? If fontconfig is not used, then indeed, you need one big font will all the glyphs. There is an issue here that some Asian fonts do not allow to modify them. Make sure the font allows modification. With a system like fontconfig, you can virtually join two fonts under the same name though you do not alter the files. Simosx 15:51, 1 June 2006 (EDT)
Work in progress
Below are some fragments that may make it in the front page.
Brazil | China | India | Nigeria | Thailand |
---|---|---|---|---|
Latin | Tibetan བོད་ཡིག, Simplified chinese 简体字 | Bengali, Devanagari, Gujarati, Gurmukhi, Kannada, Limbu, Malayalam, Oriya, Sinhala, Syloti Nagri, , Tamil, Telugu | Pannigerian | Thai |
Important issues to figure out
- Is there a requirement for the font to be hinted?
- We still do not know if there is a requirement for fontconfig. This should probably come out soon.
- We do not know if there will be a requirement for the applications to be based on GTK+ 2.x/Pango
- add here
- The main text has the following in it:
- Scripts in Pilot Countries
- Not to have included a font, for normal means that the laptop is not usable for the kids in the area the script is used.
- This is not a grammatical English sentence. What does it mean? What is the meaning of the list that follows the statement? Is it a good thing or a bad thing if a language is listed in the list?
- The quoted sentence requires rephrasing. See main document for a clarification (I am not sure who wrote the original). Simosx 17:36, 1 June 2006 (EDT)