Talk:Acoustic Tape Measure: Difference between revisions
(some ideas) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
--[[User:Homunq|Homunq]] 16:46, 5 October 2007 (EDT) |
--[[User:Homunq|Homunq]] 16:46, 5 October 2007 (EDT) |
||
ps. speed of sound depends on altitude as well as temperature. I think that asking people to guess the temperature is more accurate AND educational than just guessing it using time/location. |
Revision as of 20:48, 5 October 2007
Some ideas:
Measure velocity using doppler?
For something like the "dance revolution graph" activity - maybe you could take some shortcuts.
idea 1: Have one computer broadcast an intermittent square wave at a given frequency. I understand that the result would lack some high harmonics necessary for a true square wave - but I bet it would be good enough to make the calculation of when the thing starts pretty simple. Certainly less robust than full-spectrum white noise, but probably good enough after an initial calibration against white noise.
idea 2: Have one computer broadcast a continuous square wave, and the other one just count beats (using some reasonable assumptions about possible accelerations to throw away bad data). This would tend to get progressively out-of-sync, but it would be fully real-time. Maybe have an intermittent transient to resync...
The point is, doing a whole deconvolve or whatever to match a known sound is computationally much heavier than just binning against a known frequency - sine or square, either way it's even easier than an FFT.
I actually imagine that maybe you could find some good algorithms in use in GPS recievers for electromagnetic stuff - the problem is similar.
(I know - everyone can kibbutz, few will code.)
--Homunq 16:46, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
ps. speed of sound depends on altitude as well as temperature. I think that asking people to guess the temperature is more accurate AND educational than just guessing it using time/location.