Wireless: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


Other wiki resources are:
Other wiki resources are:
* [[Mesh Networking]]
* [[Mesh network]]
* [[Wireless Repeater]]
* [[Wireless repeater]]
* [[Active Antenna]]
* [[Active Antenna]]



Revision as of 06:41, 10 November 2007

  english | 한국어 HowTo [ID# 76297]  +/-  


Design Goals

OLPC's laptops will be deployed in places where there will be very little or no infrastructure at all. We wanted to make sure that the laptops could connect to other laptops in their vicinity regardless of the presence or not of connectivity infrastructure. We also wanted to help kids share Internet connectivity without any additional infrastructure.

It became very clear that the utility of the usual laptop wired connectivity options (ethernet, modem) will be very limited under those constraints and a relative waste of our limited bill of materials budget. Instead we have to concentrate our resources to increase the utility and functionality of the wireless network adapter.

To achieve our design goals we chose to add self organizing multihop (mesh) networking capabilities to the laptop's network adapter. The constraints imposed by our Mesh Network Details mandate the use of System on Chip (SoC) Wireless Adapter, with the mesh networking protocol running directly on the adapter's CPU.

Other wiki resources are:

Network Adapter

Mesh Wireless

The Mesh wireless protocol it's an implementation of the 802.11s draft.

User Experience

There is quite a bit of complexity to properly configuring the wireless network in the variety of use scenarios that the children will be encountering. Our bias is towards making efficient use of mesh networking, but in some situations, infrastructure mode will be used. In those cases, the laptop will offer mesh portal (MPP) services to other laptops in the vicinity. If no mesh or access point is visible, then the laptop will become a mesh point on Channel 1. An additional bias to our approach is to use Channels 1, 11, and 6 when possible. This is an efficient use of spectrum as it lets us use three channels with essentially no overlap.

The basic flow:

  1. Start with Channel 1
  2. Try DHCP
  3. If successful, then CONNECTED/DONE (DHCP)
  4. Try AUTOID
  5. If successful, then CONNECTED/DONE (AUTOID)
  6. Goto Channel 11
  7. Try DHCP
  8. If successful, then CONNECTED/DONE (DHCP)
  9. Try AUTOID
  10. If successful, then CONNECTED/DONE (AUTOID)
  11. Goto Channel 6
  12. Try DHCP
  13. If successful, then CONNECTED/DONE (DHCP)
  14. Try AUTOID
  15. If successful, then CONNECTED/DONE (AUTOID)
  16. Try last successful AP
  17. If successful, then CONNECTED; offer MPP/DONE.
  18. REPEAT DHCP/AUTOID loop on all channels.
  19. No connection? Become Mesh Point on Channel 1.

Rollover will reveal the difference between DHCP and AUTOID; IP address; Gateway; DNS;. AP or Mesh; ESSID; Channel Number; and Signal Strength (AP only).

  • AP icon on Mesh View should distinguish between access points that are open vs. requiring a key.
  • AP icon on Mesh View should distinguish between access points on Channels 1,11,6 and other channels.
  • AP icon should indicate that you are offering MPP service to others.
  • Ethernet icon should indicate you are offering MPP service to others.

From the Mesh View, you should be able to jump directly into Steps 1, 16, or 19 above (search for mesh, select AP, select mesh point).

Capturing wireless traffic on the xo

Here are the steps to capture wireless traffic on the xo:

  • Pre-req:
yum install tcpdump
killall NetworkManager
  • Then:
echo $TRAFFIC_MASK > /sys/class/net/msh0/device/libertas_rtap
ifconfig rtap0 up
tcpdump -i rtap0 -s 1500 -w capture.dump
TRAFFIC_MASK bits:
Data frames: 0x1
Mgmt frames but beacons: 0x2
Beacons: 0x4
  • Then open capture.dump with wireshark.

To interpret mesh traffic correctly, you will want to compile wireshark with this patch: https://cozybit1.dnsalias.org/~javier/patches/wireshark-0.99.5-fw-5.220.11-support.patch

Antenna Reliability

The antenna "ears" have been subjected to drop testing in both the open and close positions, and survive multiple drops onto concrete from desk height. They are made of rubber surface over a polycarbonate center section, allowing them to flex upon impact.

In the event of antenna breakage, there are two antenna. A laptop will continue to function satisfactorily with a single ear in a school setting, and should suffer only slight degradation in performance in more remote settings. The ear was redesigned late in the design process (C-build and later) to simplify repair --- replacing an ear now requires the removal of only six screws, thanks to a connector embedded in the rotary hinge.