Talk:Contents manifest specification: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Paper tiger?) |
m (Talk:Manifest Specification moved to Talk:Contents Manifest Specification: Standardizing on calling these 'contents' files.) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 18:29, 6 December 2007
What use is this?
OK, the Activity_bundles spec says it's required, but it's a complicated gibberish format, without any tools to generate it. Is this just a useless paper spec? Do applications *actually* have to include a manifest, sign it, etc? Until there are real tools for anybody to easily make one, my app isn't gonna have one...
Let's go back to RPM, or preferably Deb. This not-invented-here packaging system is just painful.