Talk:Restricted formats: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Lockdown== |
==Lockdown== |
||
The inclusion of the <nowiki>{{OLPC}}</nowiki> tag is not intended as a lockdown; rather is it intended to assure our gentle readers that this page is vetted by OLPC. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 18:49, 11 December 2007 (EST) |
The inclusion of the <nowiki>{{OLPC}}</nowiki> tag is not intended as a lockdown; rather is it intended to assure our gentle readers that this page is vetted by OLPC. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 18:49, 11 December 2007 (EST) |
||
::Apologies, I realised after I wrote it, and attempted to revert.... Clearly it is vetted carefully! --[[User:172.159.48.223|172.159.48.223]] 20:13, 11 December 2007 (EST) |
Revision as of 01:13, 12 December 2007
Adobe version
Has anyone tested version 48? I had had some trouble with it. 31 was more stable. --Walter 16:15, 14 September 2007 (EDT)
- Yes, I've only tested this last version on a B4: very little video frames per second and the audio skipped a lot, when i tested youtube and google video.--HoboPrimate 21:36, 14 September 2007 (EDT)
- Could you document what you typed in the command line to get the rpm of version 31? When I tried it, it looked like 31 was no longer available? Thanks --Tomhannen 18:22, 11 December 2007 (EST)
- 31 may be available in the bundle of older versions for which I provided a link on the Adobe Flash page. I've had a copy kicking around that I've been using. --Walter 18:49, 11 December 2007 (EST)
- 31 does not seem to be in that bundle from Adobe. Not sure where to get an "official" copy from. --Walter 18:52, 11 December 2007 (EST)
- Could you document what you typed in the command line to get the rpm of version 31? When I tried it, it looked like 31 was no longer available? Thanks --Tomhannen 18:22, 11 December 2007 (EST)
Lockdown
The inclusion of the {{OLPC}} tag is not intended as a lockdown; rather is it intended to assure our gentle readers that this page is vetted by OLPC. --Walter 18:49, 11 December 2007 (EST)
- Apologies, I realised after I wrote it, and attempted to revert.... Clearly it is vetted carefully! --172.159.48.223 20:13, 11 December 2007 (EST)