Template talk:Support-nav: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Some notes. a) the chat link currently goes to the [[communication channels#chat]] section. This should be reviewed and merged with [[IRC]] if appropriate; or people |
Some notes. a) the chat link currently goes to the [[communication channels#chat]] section. This should be reviewed and merged with [[IRC]] if appropriate; or people directed to the latter. b) the above link shows nav at a sectional level. I find this works for long detailed pages; we are reaching that level of complexity. but it is a first; please comment. c) I like the borderless imagmap for navigation. perhaps we can come up with guidelines for same in the [[style guide]]. --[[User:Sj|Sj]] [[User talk:Sj|<font color="fc9" style="font-size:70%">talk to me</font>]] 23:16, 24 December 2007 (EST) |
||
:While I laud what I think you are trying to achieve here, could you please try to be more respectful of the visual design we have tried to carry throughout the project? It is not just a matter of personal taste or opinion: disruptions in the visual flow are just that: disruptive. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 08:18, 25 December 2007 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 13:18, 25 December 2007
Some notes. a) the chat link currently goes to the communication channels#chat section. This should be reviewed and merged with IRC if appropriate; or people directed to the latter. b) the above link shows nav at a sectional level. I find this works for long detailed pages; we are reaching that level of complexity. but it is a first; please comment. c) I like the borderless imagmap for navigation. perhaps we can come up with guidelines for same in the style guide. --Sj talk to me 23:16, 24 December 2007 (EST)
- While I laud what I think you are trying to achieve here, could you please try to be more respectful of the visual design we have tried to carry throughout the project? It is not just a matter of personal taste or opinion: disruptions in the visual flow are just that: disruptive. --Walter 08:18, 25 December 2007 (EST)