Talk:Intel: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Intel had asked us not to speak publicly about the dollar figure of their membership fee. In fact, by the letter of the contract, Intel owes a non-refundable fee for 2008 that I presume will never be paid. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 11:51, 6 January 2008 (EST) |
:Intel had asked us not to speak publicly about the dollar figure of their membership fee. In fact, by the letter of the contract, Intel owes a non-refundable fee for 2008 that I presume will never be paid. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 11:51, 6 January 2008 (EST) |
||
Intel lost my good will. Don't they know that you can help children while still making a profit. They need not be mutually exclusive. Like Google, AMD, NewsCorp, RedHat, etc are doing now. [[User:210.210.40.174|210.210.40.174]] 20:57, 6 January 2008 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 01:57, 7 January 2008
revert as press release? they should post this to the talk page :) 18.85.46.183 21:16, 13 July 2007 (EDT)
Quick question, should the $6 million donation be noted, or will it be returned? 65.101.230.211 11:38, 6 January 2008 (EST)
- Intel had asked us not to speak publicly about the dollar figure of their membership fee. In fact, by the letter of the contract, Intel owes a non-refundable fee for 2008 that I presume will never be paid. --Walter 11:51, 6 January 2008 (EST)
Intel lost my good will. Don't they know that you can help children while still making a profit. They need not be mutually exclusive. Like Google, AMD, NewsCorp, RedHat, etc are doing now. 210.210.40.174 20:57, 6 January 2008 (EST)