Talk:XO colors

How were these colors arrived at? I'm curious because there are some that are very close together (EG, BCCEFF and BCCDFF). When you look at just the luminance (for evaluating distinguishability for colorblind people or on a b/w screen), there is even more clustering, with most adjacent colors (ordered by luminance) differing by <2%.

Evenly spacing 20 colors along the luminance spectrum would provide a set of much more distinguishable colors (5% difference in luminance between adjacent colors). Using a 8/21 rotation around the hues (all with 100% saturation) can give fairly distinguishable colors. That could be further improved by either varying saturation, increasing the hue rotation at the extremes of luminance (and decreasing toward the middle), or any of a number of other means.

I also noticed the BCCEFF/BCCDFF similarity... I assume it is a typo in the code. I believe the pairs were arrived at by hand-matching color swatches for pairs that "looked good" together (based on a recollection of a photograph of a wall with color pairs on it). Note that these colors are only used to form the color pairs for user logos, and that while these logos are used to distinguish users, there are additional ways to distinguish them (by name, at the least). Which is a good thing, because with only several hundred pairs, it is statistically probable that a class of around 20 students will have a duplicate color pair. Also note that while some colors are close together in luminance, it's possible that the other color in their respective pairs may be sufficiently different to distinguish them. The OLPC people are aware of the value (ahem) of using luminance-spaced colors in their interface, especially given the XO's additional monochromatic screen mode. —Joe 00:22, 7 December 2007 (EST)