Browser improvements
|
NOTE: The contents of this page are not set in stone, and are subject to change! This page is a draft in active flux ... |
|
For 2017, global support volunteers seek the best browser enhancements (tweaks, hacks, alternatives) to keep 1000's of XO laptops most useful in schools that do not have budgets for new hardware. Browser wars, like most arms races, are not fully solvable in the end -- still we've learned a lot since we came together in 2007, so material progress may now be possible. Specifically:
A decade later compatibility questions are as much about fixed offline content (Khan Academy, KA Lite, Kiwix, RACHEL, XSCE / Internet-in-a-Box etc) rather than the online treadmill of constant upgrades. Glitzy, overweight broadband/cloud sites and their adverts are generally NOT the educational priorities of developing world schools, who regardless cannot afford Internet costs (tragically even simple news articles > 1 MB in 2016) nevermind streaming costs inherent to YouTube/etc. HTML 5.1 / Javascript are a moving target, that remain a noble goal: if we stay grounded in the reality that remote/offline deployments do software maintenance on an annual basis At Best -- even when serious security threats arise -- as IT budgets just don't exist within high-poverty communities :/
No question XO-1 lacks the horsepower of XO-1.5, XO-1.75 and XO-4. So XO-1 will be a secondary focus, whatever the outcome of our research. Particularly if we determine that OLPC OS 13.2.8's browsers (Browse 157.3 in Sugar and Epiphany 3.6.1 in Gnome) already have made sufficient progress (for XO-1's most limited uses) in recent years!
Finally, diverging from Fedora 18 (released Jan 15th 2013, underlying 13.2.8) is also not our goal, despite its old age (Happy 4th Birthday, thanks to all who've kept everything together along the way!) Still, radical transformative solutions will be considered IF proven, e.g. certain high schools explicitly do not want Sugar, and ask us to look into Firefox, Chrome (etc) on Gnome if not other kernels / desktops / platforms / OS's as appropriate?
Question: beyond HTML5/Javascript industry norms, does it help everyone if we draw up a testing matrix right here, showing (1) which most common codecs, (2) which lightweight encodings-rates, and (3) which common content packs... work well (or tolerably well) on which platforms? An example content pack being the very popular PhET science simulations, whose browser/Javascript compatibility can be hit-or-miss.
In conclusion: here are some people who have developed great expertise with modern browser/codec compatibility on XO laptops, that I (Adam Holt) hope to call to gather all the best ideas here on this page, helping us all organize our legacy for 2017 and beyond:
- James Cameron
- Gonzalo Odiard
- Tony Anderson
- Terry Gillett
- Nathan Riddle
- Jerry Vonau
- Tim Moody
- George Hunt - suggests Firefox on Gnome on XO-1.5 (does this also work on XO-1.75 and XO-4? is a Sugar icon possible?) and warns us that Chrome is no longer supported on 32-bit OS's
- Kevin Gordon
- Nick Doiron
- Alex Perez - Chrome is a voracious consumer of RAM, even if it did work on XO-1.5+ (but is Firefox that much better?)
- ?
Thanks! Discussions most welcome on the unleashkids mailing list. Aside/Clarification regarding proprietary codecs and Adobe Flash: thankfully there is much less demand for Flash in 2017 as compared to 2007, but still such schools exist, and real-world workarounds are welcome within this grassroots exchange -- even if such mods can't all be legally mainlined/published, by definition!
