Community testing meetings/2008-10-30: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TOCright}} |
{{TOCright}} |
||
'''''This meeting is over |
'''''This meeting is over - thanks to all those who participated!'' The meeting was in #olpc-meeting on [[Start date::October 30, 2008]] at 2100 UTC.''' Please join the conversation on the [http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/testing testing mailing list] to talk about what happened (alternatively, you can use the meeting's talk page, but a post to the mailing list is likely to get read faster). |
||
== Meeting logs == |
== Meeting logs == |
||
See exactly what happened at http://meeting.laptop.org/olpc-meeting.log.20081030_1700.html |
See exactly what happened at http://meeting.laptop.org/olpc-meeting.log.20081030_1700.html |
||
== Attendance == |
|||
Listed by IRC nick in order of speaking. |
|||
* joef |
|||
* mchua |
|||
* cjl |
|||
* kimquirk |
|||
* frandog |
|||
* gregdek |
|||
* cjb |
|||
* lfaraone |
|||
* Ian_Daniher |
|||
* bjordan |
|||
== Previous meeting's action items == |
== Previous meeting's action items == |
Revision as of 04:37, 31 October 2008
This meeting is over - thanks to all those who participated! The meeting was in #olpc-meeting on Start date::October 30, 2008 at 2100 UTC. Please join the conversation on the testing mailing list to talk about what happened (alternatively, you can use the meeting's talk page, but a post to the mailing list is likely to get read faster).
Meeting logs
See exactly what happened at http://meeting.laptop.org/olpc-meeting.log.20081030_1700.html
Attendance
Listed by IRC nick in order of speaking.
- joef
- mchua
- cjl
- kimquirk
- frandog
- gregdek
- cjb
- lfaraone
- Ian_Daniher
- bjordan
Previous meeting's action items
None; this is our first meeting.
Activity testing
This was the pre-meeting agenda item - see the logs to see what was discussed.
We've been asked to tackle Activity testing as a first Big Task - we thought we'd try an Activity of the Week format, starting with Analyze (thank you Eduardo!) because that Activity itself would be a useful tool for testers to get log data from.
I think we need a 2-pass process; one "rough pass" week where people clean up the Activity's page, feature list, test cases, etc to make them testable by the general public - see http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Analyze&oldid=115198 and then compare to the current Analyze, and then see http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Tests/Activity/Analyze&oldid=166270 and compare to Tests/Activity/Analyze.
- Thoughts?
- Volunteers to help finish cleaning up Analyze for release to testing public?
- Suggestions for next Activities to test (or good criteria for selecting one?) I was thinking Log.