Feature roadmap/Run Fedora applications on XO: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Automated import of articles) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Name= Run Fedora applications on XO |
|Name= Run Fedora applications on XO |
||
|Feature subcategory=Linux and OS |
|Feature subcategory=Linux and OS |
||
|Requesters= Ed |
|Requesters= Ed and David |
||
|Requirements= <br> |
|Requirements= <br> |
||
Overview. This feature is designed to address the persistent requests to run more applications. An alternative approach would be the "easy sugarization" feature above. This implementation is currently preferred because it also helps us get all the XO software "upstream". That would bring in more developers and add flexibility for XO users. |
Overview. This feature is designed to address the persistent requests to run more applications. An alternative approach would be the "easy sugarization" feature above. This implementation is currently preferred because it also helps us get all the XO software "upstream". That would bring in more developers and add flexibility for XO users. |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* Open issue about Security. How do we protect security and still make Fedora + "standard" window manager available? GS |
* Open issue about Security. How do we protect security and still make Fedora + "standard" window manager available? GS |
||
* Must leave at least 200MBs free when Fedora + Desktop and Sugar are available. (GS test of new query system, not copied to feature roadmap source yet) |
|||
|Specification= |
|Specification= |
||
|Owners= |
|Owners=Greg |
||
}} |
}} |
Revision as of 17:03, 10 December 2008
Feature subcategory | Is part of::Category:Linux and OS | |
Requesters | {{#arraymap:Ed and David|,|x|Requested by::x}} | |
Requirements | Overview. This feature is designed to address the persistent requests to run more applications. An alternative approach would be the "easy sugarization" feature above. This implementation is currently preferred because it also helps us get all the XO software "upstream". That would bring in more developers and add flexibility for XO users.
| |
Specification | ||
Owners | {{#arraymap:Greg|,|x|Contact person::User:x}} | |
Priority | not indicated | |
Helps deployability? | not indicated | |
Target for 9.1? | not indicated |