Feature roadmap/Run Fedora applications on XO: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (separate requesters with comma) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Name= Run Fedora applications on XO |
|Name= Run Fedora applications on XO |
||
|Feature subcategory=Linux and OS |
|Feature subcategory=Linux and OS |
||
|Requesters= Ed |
|Requesters= Ed, David |
||
|Requirements= <br> |
|Requirements= <br> |
||
Overview. This feature is designed to address the persistent requests to run more applications. An alternative approach would be the "easy sugarization" feature above. This implementation is currently preferred because it also helps us get all the XO software "upstream". That would bring in more developers and add flexibility for XO users. |
Overview. This feature is designed to address the persistent requests to run more applications. An alternative approach would be the "easy sugarization" feature above. This implementation is currently preferred because it also helps us get all the XO software "upstream". That would bring in more developers and add flexibility for XO users. |
Revision as of 05:16, 21 December 2008
Feature subcategory | Is part of::Category:Linux and OS | |
Requesters | {{#arraymap:Ed, David|,|x|Requested by::x}} | |
Requirements | Overview. This feature is designed to address the persistent requests to run more applications. An alternative approach would be the "easy sugarization" feature above. This implementation is currently preferred because it also helps us get all the XO software "upstream". That would bring in more developers and add flexibility for XO users.
| |
Specification | From post by David Lang, http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2008-December/021548.html Sizes of recent window manager images:
I gave this a try with latest Joyride (2592), and get a couple of depsolving problems. Maybe one of the RPM ninjas on fedora-olpc-list could take a look at how we could resolve these? Alternatively, maybe we should be hand-picking the list of packages to add, since I see some deps in there we don't want, e.g.: --> Processing Dependency: texlive = 2007-35.fc10 for package: kpathsea Here's the list of dependency errors: --> Finished Dependency Resolution Possibly useful tool for building Fedora images: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ApplianceTools Kickstart file from Peter for Fedora 9: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/olpc/ | |
Owners | {{#arraymap:Gregorio, Peter, Erik|,|x|Contact person::User:x}} | |
Priority | Priority::1 | |
Helps deployability? | Helps deployability::yes | |
Target for 9.1? | Target for 9.1::yes |