OLPC:Policy project: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: <pre> policy /and/ templates <_sj_> I'd like to migrate some FA, Community-Portal, and RfA templates <_sj_> ffm has been working on language-request templates (from [m:]) <_sj_> also peer...) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
⚫ | |||
We need to add a few policies here. |
|||
* [[OLPC:PR]] - [[OLPC:Peer review|Peer review]] |
|||
* [[OLPC:FC]] - [[OLPC:featured content|featured content]] |
|||
* [[OLPC:CfR]] - [[OLPC:Content for Review|Content for Review]] (a first-cut review that sends things to [[category:delete|deletion]], peer review, or cleanup. |
|||
== from irc, for ffm == |
|||
<pre> |
<pre> |
||
⚫ | |||
<_sj_> I'd like to migrate some FA, Community-Portal, and RfA templates |
<_sj_> I'd like to migrate some FA, Community-Portal, and RfA templates |
||
<_sj_> ffm has been working on language-request templates (from [m:]) |
<_sj_> ffm has been working on language-request templates (from [m:]) |
Revision as of 01:45, 14 February 2008
Policy and templates
We need to add a few policies here.
- OLPC:PR - Peer review
- OLPC:FC - featured content
- OLPC:CfR - Content for Review (a first-cut review that sends things to, peer review, or cleanup.
from irc, for ffm
<_sj_> I'd like to migrate some FA, Community-Portal, and RfA templates <_sj_> ffm has been working on language-request templates (from [m:]) <_sj_> also peer review and media-licensing templates * neskaya shudders at the letters RfA. * _freelikegnu is now known as freelikegnu <_sj_> well, I mainly agree with you <_sj_> I do want a "pages for review" instead of an AfD and "permission requests" instead of rfa * neskaya nods. <neskaya> That makes a bit more sense. <_sj_> but a template for "here's what this user is doing and is up to" is helpful <_sj_> see for instance all of the red-linked userpages on [[Requests for permissions]] on the current wiki <_sj_> at any rate, we're closer to reasonable process for that page than for peer review or meta-policy (here's where the policies are!) or meta-faq (here's where the faq's are!) * mvn071 (n=mvn071@vijn.xs4all.nl) has joined #olpc <neskaya> mmhm. * bgola` (n=bgola@189.79.52.38) has joined #olpc <_sj_> and to ease the load on our email queues, "contact us" should be closer to a three-page heirarchy that pushes people to community outlets when possible, than the current "here are email addresses to spam!" offering