User:Mchua/Braindumps/Community lessons: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (New page: ''draft of an essay I'm writing on things I wished I could say to all new OLPC community members.'' OSS is not magic pixie dust. Open-source in word (licensing) is not the same as open-so...)
 
mNo edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
Operating openly preserves privacy.
Operating openly preserves privacy.
Your work and the ability to participate have to be available to people who don't explicitly ask for permission.
Your work and the ability to participate have to be available to people who don't explicitly ask for permission.

From Kim Quirk, on the mailing lists:

<pre>
I have been trying to understand it, explain it, live with it ,
and improve it for a year now. What I think is going on is a unique
and somewhat chaotic (perfect storm?) intersection of non-profit, open
source, research lab cultures with the need to ship a real product.

The non-profit provides us with excess emotion towards a mission,
where heated discussions are extra heated. Open source brings us a
regionally and culturally diverse community of people that need lots
of good communications and teamwork to be focused and productive. The
research background brings an individualism, little or no management
structure, and a lot of really smart people.

On top of all that are the 'company' like things we have tried to
achieve: create a production quality product with 7 new technologies,
and launch over 300,000 of them in the first 4-5 months of production.
</pre>

Revision as of 03:43, 23 May 2008

draft of an essay I'm writing on things I wished I could say to all new OLPC community members.

OSS is not magic pixie dust. Open-source in word (licensing) is not the same as open-source in thought and deed (community processes).

Operating openly preserves privacy. Your work and the ability to participate have to be available to people who don't explicitly ask for permission.

From Kim Quirk, on the mailing lists:

I have been trying to understand it, explain it, live with it ,
and improve it for a year now. What I think is going on is a unique
and somewhat chaotic (perfect storm?) intersection of non-profit, open
source, research lab cultures with the need to ship a real product.

The non-profit provides us with excess emotion towards a mission,
where heated discussions are extra heated. Open source brings us a
regionally and culturally diverse community of people that need lots
of good communications and teamwork to be focused and productive. The
research background brings an individualism, little or no management
structure, and a lot of really smart people.

On top of all that are the 'company' like things we have tried to
achieve: create a production quality product with 7 new technologies,
and launch over 300,000 of them in the first 4-5 months of production.