ECO/8.2.0/Checklist: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
< ECO‎ | 8.2.0
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 79: Line 79:
Activities signoff: ___ ''build engineer''
Activities signoff: ___ ''build engineer''
Licensing signoff: ___ ''compliance consultant''
Licensing signoff: ___ ''compliance consultant''

* This signoff signifies that, to the best of the signatory's knowledge,
* The licensing signoff signifies that, to the best of the signatory's knowledge,
"OLPC's compliance with its obligations under free software licenses is
"OLPC's compliance with its obligations under free software licenses is
better in this release than in its previous most-compliant release."
better in this release than in its previous most-compliant release."

Revision as of 00:15, 18 September 2008

This page lists the sign-offs required to advance through the software release process. Consult that page for additional details on each step and sign-off.

Proposal/Review

This section should be completed by the Triage team.

ECO Name: ECO/8.2.0
ECO Target date: September, 2008 (slipped from August)
ECO Champion: Michael Stone
Proposal approved: (date and Triage team signature)
  March, 2008 --Michael Stone 22:16, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Candidate build

This section should be completed by the build master.

Build number: ???

Test

This section should be completed by the QA lead.

Build tested:
Checklist
 Specific issue testing:            ___
 1 hour smoke test:                 ___
 Clean install:                     ___  
 Upgrade testing:                   ___  List builds tested from:
 Downgrade testing:                 ___  List builds tested to:
 Tested on C2 and C3:               ___
 Tested on NiMH batteries:          ___
 Tested on en_US                    ___  *  the degree of l10n/i18n for *'d keyboards and locales 
           es_*                     ___  *  will be considered by the release team in their judgements.
           mn_MN                    ___  *  
           ht_HT                    ___  *  
           fr_RW                    ___  *  note: while there are many Spanish and Arabic locales, 
           rw_RW                    ___  *  we don't yet distinguish between them.
           am_ET                    ___  *
           ar_*                     ___
           kh_CA                    ___
           fa_AF                    ___
           hi_HI                    ___
           pt_BR                    ___
           ???                      ___
 Open, WEP, and WPA APs tested:     ___  List brands, if appropriate:
 Field testing, if possible:        ___
Release to signature/final test: (date and QA lead signature)
_____________________________________________________________

Additional comments, if any:

Signature

This section should be completed by the security team.

Build to be signed:
Keys to be used:
Security-critical components
  olpcrd version (rpm -q olpcrd):
    Signed off by/date: ________________________________________

  Firmware/OFW version (/ofw/openprom/model; check against rpm -q bootfw):
    Signed off by/date: ________________________________________

  Firmware/EC version: (/ofw/ec-name):
    Signed off by/date: _Rsmith 22:53, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

  Kernel version: (uname -r):
    Signed off by/date: ________________________________________

Signatures above certify that, to the best of your knowledge, the above components are at least as secure as other components signed with these keys.

This section should be completed by the build engineer.

Checklist
 Appropriate sign-offs present above:          ___
 Versions in build match those approved above: ___
 QA lead sign-off under 'Test' above:          ___
 Packages in build match those expected:       ___

Checklist sign-off: (date and build master signature)
_____________________________________________________________

Other signoffs

Upon or after announcement of the Signed Candidate:

 Documentation signoff:                ___     support lead
 Activities signoff:                   ___     build engineer
 Licensing signoff:                    ___     compliance consultant
   * The licensing signoff signifies that, to the best of the signatory's knowledge, 
     "OLPC's compliance with its obligations under free software licenses is 
     better in this release than in its previous most-compliant release."

One week after announcement of the Signed Candidate:

 One week of testing has elapsed:      ___     release team
 No untriaged bugs:                    ___     triage team
 No blocks:8.2.0 bugs:                 ___     triage team
 Release notes are approved:           ___     product management lead

Final test

This section should be completed by the QA lead.

Build tested:
Checklist
 1 hour smoke test:                    ___ (catch signature process regressions)
 USB stick fresh install on wp laptop: ___
 USB stick upgrade on wp laptop:       ___
 Network upgrade on wp:                ___
 Other testing (describe):
Sign-off for release: (date and QA lead signature)
_____________________________________________________________

This section should be completed by the release team.

Approved build number:
OS version:
Firmware/OFW version:
Firmware/EC version:
Wireless firmware version:

Champion sign off: (date and champion signature)
_____________________________________________________________
Release team final sign off on ECO: (date and release team signature)
_____________________________________________________________

Given three signatures above, the candidate build can be published as official.