Distributing OLPC: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
RafaelOrtiz (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* Bug-tracking ==> trac-hacks + [http://bugseverywhere.org/be/show/HomePage Bugs everywhere] |
* Bug-tracking ==> trac-hacks + [http://bugseverywhere.org/be/show/HomePage Bugs everywhere] |
||
* Wiki ==> (MikMik) (Betawiki) conected to Mainwiki? |
* Wiki ==> (MikMik) (Betawiki) conected to Mainwiki? |
||
* Training. |
|||
== Content distribution == |
== Content distribution == |
Revision as of 04:28, 19 November 2008
Making OLPC models of communities and development more decentralized, OLPC has to encourage communities of free software developers around the world, has to listen to teachers and students inquires and has to give them ways of making them happen.
- The distribution has to be in all the layers, technological, content, and pedagogical.
- Communication between this layers has to be improved, developer meetings like the XOcamp must be also done in major deployment sites.
Tech distribution
- Git ==>Gitorious
- Bug-tracking ==> trac-hacks + Bugs everywhere
- Wiki ==> (MikMik) (Betawiki) conected to Mainwiki?
- Training.
Content distribution
- Wikipedia slices are good but we have to find software to make easy to digitalize already existing content, for example oral traditions of tribes, papers, books.etc.
- Make an special collection of e-books to use on the XO and Sugar, and made with these forgotten ,materials of countries.
Pedagogical distribution
- it's truth that OLCP can't interfere with each countries choices on pedagogics and education, but mailists, IRCs, blogs and others are a way to discuss ideas between OLPC leaning team and countries learning teams.
This duscussion could be benefical to both OLPC and countries.
Community distribution
- IRC and pesonal (i.e not by internet ;)) meetings. in the states and in mayor deployment sites, reunions between devs and teachers or educational authorities recommended.