Input methods: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(FIELD_OTHER)
Line 106: Line 106:
etc.
etc.


FIELD_MESSAGE_acelliacchi
==Descriptions of IME engines==

===SCIM Smart Common Input Method platform===
Moved to separate [[SCIM]] page.

The SCIM platform supports the following IMEs on Linux and other forms of Unix.
* English/European
* [[Arabic]]
* Ethiopic/[[Amharic]]
* [[Cyrillic]]
* Alphabets and Languages of [[India]]
** [[Assamese]]
** [[Bengali]]
** [[Gujarati]]
** [[Hindi]] (Devanagari alphabet)
** [[Kannada]]
** [[Malayalam]]
** [[Oriya]]
** [[Punjabi]] (Gurmukhi alphabet)
** [[Tamil]]
** [[Telugu]]
* Nepali
* Greek
* Iranian (Persian, Farsi)
* Tibetan
* Hebrew
* Cambodian
* Laotian
* Thai
* [[Inuktitut]]
* [[IPA]]
* [[Vietnamese]]
* [[Japanese]]
* [[Korean]]
* [[Simplified Chinese]]
* [[Traditional Chinese]]

RAJESH

R A J

===Chinput===

[http://www.opencjk.org/~yumj/project-chinput-e.html Chinese XIM Input Server]


==Help==
==Help==

Revision as of 23:27, 16 December 2008

  english | 한국어 HowTo [ID# 187083]  +/-  


In order to input text in any particular language and writing system, we need a Unicode font to display it in, a rendering engine that knows how to display it, and a keyboard layout or Input Method Editor (IME) that provides a way to get all of the needed characters. Most alphabetic and syllabic languages can be typed on fairly simple keyboards that produce one Unicode character per key combination, using the ordinary typing keys together with Meta (usually Alt) and Compose keys. Any of several keys, including Menu and Windows keys, can be set to act as Compose. Then on Latin keyboards Compose-a-' produces á, Compose-c-, produces ç, and so on. Any accented letter that is included in Unicode in precomposed form falls within this capability. This covers letters that occur in any widely-used pre-Unicode character set, such as Latin-1 (ISO-8859-1), which supports French, German, Spanish, Italian, Scandinavian languages, and some other languages that use only the accented letters in Latin-1.

Multiple diacritics can be entered sequentially on simple keyboards of this type, while more elaborate input methods can enter more than one Unicode character code into the input buffer for each key combination. Yoruba is an example of a language that poses this choice, because it has vowel letters with an acute accent above and a dot below that are not available precomposed in Unicode.

The most elaborate IMEs are for input of CJKV characters for Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and the historical Vietnamese Chu Nomh writing. Each of these languages requires several thousand characters at a minimum, and there is a desire to have much more extensive CJKV sets available, including a number of Hong Kong characters and other recent additions, or the tens of thousands of historical characters important for scholarship.

Several hundred methods for entering CJKV characters have been invented over several decades. Among the most important (due to efficiency of use or ease of learning, or in a few cases both) are language-specific phonetic conversion systems for Chinese, Japanese, or Korean, and shape-based systems that are in principle independent of language, but in practice specific to particular countries up to now.

See also countries, languages, writing systems, fonts, locales, and keyboard layouts.

Tools

Tools for keyboard layouts, to come. loadkeys utility to load keyboard layouts.

Tools for IMEs, to come.

Input Methods

Phonetic conversion

The concept of phonetic conversion is that any CJKV language typed in any alphabet or other sound-based writing system can be converted using a combination of dictionary lookup together with grammatical and semantic analysis. The first successful phonetic conversion word processor was the Xerox 8010 J-Star, an outgrowth of the Xerox Alto computer and Smalltalk programming language in 1981. Thanks go to Alan Kay for the Alto and Smalltalk ideas, and to Joseph Becker for the language handling software. Phonetic conversion to CJKV characters exists for the following combinations, in many variations.

  • Romazi (Latin alphabet) or Zhuyin to either Traditional or Simplified Chinese hanzi 漢字
  • Hangeul 한글 (Korean alphabet) to Korean hanja 漢字
  • Romaji ローマ字 (Latin alphabet) or hiragana ひらがな syllabary to Japanese kanji 漢字

Phonetic conversion systems depend on a native alphabetic or syllabic representation, or on one or more Romanizations of the target language.

  • Chinese: Pinyin 拼音, Gwoyeu Romatzyh 國語羅馬字, Wade-Giles, and Yale are a few of hundreds
  • Japanese: Hepburn, Kunrei-shiki, Nippon-shiki, Yale
  • Korean: McCune-Reischauer (MR), Revised Romanization of Korean (RR), Yale

(Yes, the Yale Department of Linguistics was busy on the issue for decades.)

Dasher - gesture text entry

Dasher is an information-efficient text-entry interface, driven by natural continuous pointing gestures. It is a competitive text-entry system wherever a full-size keyboard cannot be used - for example, when operating a computer one-handed, by joystick, touchscreen, trackball, or mouse—particularly interesting when the OLPC is in e-book mode. It can be used for many languages (>60), and is extensible through XML files. You can try it in your browser (w/Java).

Shape-based

It has been evident to everyone who has studied Chinese characters, including ancient Chinese scholars, that one can analyze most Chinese characters into a variety of smaller parts, many of which are characters themselves, and further, into a number of specific brush strokes (or the corresponding elements for characters cast in bronze, carved into seals, scratched into oracle bones, and so on). Many attempts were made over thousands of years to analyze the character shapes for various reasons, among them dictionary making. The best known is the system of 214 radicals set forth in the 1615 CE Zihui (字彙 "Character Glossary"), edited by Mei Yingzuo (梅膺祚) during the Ming Dynasty, and made a de facto standard by the 1716 CE Kangxi Zidian (康熙字典 "Kangxi Dictionary"), compiled under the Kangxi Emperor of the Qing Dynasty.

In the computer age, numerous analyses of character shapes were made as the basis for methods for typing Chinese, including those described below, which remain in widespread use, and others. As with the radicals, shapes are generally somewhat variable. In shape-based IMEs, several shapes may be grouped together and assigned a single key. Different shape-based IMEs are usually used for Traditional and Simplified characters.

Methods by language

Traditional Chinese

Zhuyin conversion

Zhuyin 注音, or Bopomofo ㄅㄆㄇㄈ, is a Chinese alphabet used for teaching children as well as for typing Chinese input. It has multiple keyboard layouts. Zhuyin is one of the standard conversion methods for Chinese, appearing on almost all computers and some cell phones.

[Wikipedia: Zhuyin]

[Unicode: Bopomofo] code table (PDF)

Phonetic conversion method

Pinyin conversion

Phonetic conversion method, using the standard Romanization of Chinese, converted to Simplified Chinese characters.

Example: zhongguo results in 中国

Cangjie

` 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 [ ]
   手 田 水 口 廿 卜 山 戈 人 心 [ ] 、
    日 尸 木 火 土 竹 十 大 中 ; ‘
     z  難 金 女 月 弓 一 , 。 /

Shape-based. The Cangjie keyboard layout has 24 simple Chinese characters on it, plus a key for "difficult" 難 characters. All of the common brush strokes and many common combinations are mapped to the 24 base characters. Characters are analyzed into these combinations, and then 1 to 5 of them are selected for typing, according to a moderately complex set of rules.

Example: 日月 results in 明.

Four Corners

Shape-based. The corners of a character are encoded, and a code for the whole character created from them.

etc.

Simplified Chinese

Pinyin

Wubi

etc.

Japanese

Romaji (ASCII) conversion

Kana conversion

etc.

Korean

Romaja (ASCII) conversion

Generally, not used.

Hangeul conversion

etc.

FIELD_MESSAGE_acelliacchi

Help

Tests of IMEs, need help from expert users.

External links