OLPC talk:Videos: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(reorganized the 'debate'...) |
m (moved Talk:Video of the OLPC to OLPC talk:Videos) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Which style== |
|||
The [http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Video_of_the_OLPC&oldid=22089 OLD] or [http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Video_of_the_OLPC&oldid=22116 NEW] (not necessarily better) layout? |
|||
Please sign your comments. |
|||
---- |
|||
===Arguments to keep the [http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Video_of_the_OLPC&oldid=22089 OLD] style=== |
|||
I like better the old way to link to the items, how do we undo Xavi's latest edit? |
|||
Or maybe we should have someone tell us the format that is best for listing videos organized by date of submition? |
|||
Is it possible to have somekind of RSS feed to receive updates from this page? |
|||
Some videos are linked to from http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Current_events I wonder should all videos be put over to that page or is it fine with a Video_of_the_OLPC page? |
|||
OLD is better I think. No need for bold, no need for all the space next to each date, there nearly never is 2 videos on the same date. And people don't want to scroll down so much I think. |
|||
And you have taken this one out of the new layout: |
|||
French presentation of OLPC computer and TamTam software |
|||
:Nope, it's under December 19th, 2006... since it didn't have a date, I checked the site and inserted it in the proper place... I have '''no intention''' of marginalizing anything there! :) --[[User:Xavi|Xavi]] 08:09, 24 January 2007 (EST) |
|||
=== Arguments to keep the [http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Video_of_the_OLPC&oldid=22116 NEW] (not necessarily better) layout === |
|||
:Hi! I have no problem with undoing my changes... I've jotted it down to remind me. |
|||
:I had thought about doing a table (but it can get messy) so I decided for the glossary-like style which highlighted the date and indented the description (thought it would be clearer). |
|||
:Anyway, I'll wait a bit for others to express their opinions, and thus have a community decision. If nobody else gives feedback... what do we do?--[[User:Xavi|Xavi]] 09:35, 22 January 2007 (EST) |
|||
===Alternative possible layouts=== |
|||
Or maybe the best layout is to do like: |
|||
{| |
|||
|- |
|||
|align="right"|3 Jan. 2007 |
|||
| networkworld.com| [http://www.networkworld.com/news/2007/010307-olpc-aims-for-mass-production.html OLPC Aims for Mass Production in Third Quarter] |
|||
|- |
|||
|align="right"|3 Jan. 2007 |
|||
| IDG.net| [http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9007078&intsrc=hm_list One Laptop per Child Sweetens Hardware with 'Sugar' UI] |
|||
|- |
|||
|align="right"|3 Jan. 2007 |
|||
| YAHOO! Finance| [http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/070103/20070103005194.html?.v=1 OLPC Announces First-of-Its Kind User Interface for XO Laptop Computer] |
|||
|- |
|||
|align="right"|2 Jan. 2007 |
|||
| Bicyclemark's Communique (podcast)| [http://bicyclemark.org/blog/2007/01/bm176-one-laptop-per-child/ One Laptop Per Child (@23C3)] |
|||
|- |
|||
|} |
|||
:As I said, tables can get messy... just corrected yours a bit. |
|||
:I still think that 'glossary-like' entries is a reasonable compromise, although I agree that it adds vertical volume to the list...--[[User:Xavi|Xavi]] 08:09, 24 January 2007 (EST) |
|||