Feature roadmap/Run Fedora applications on XO: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Name= Run Fedora applications on XO |
|Name= Run Fedora applications on XO |
||
|Feature subcategory=Linux and OS |
|Feature subcategory=Linux and OS |
||
|Requesters= Ed |
|Requesters= Ed, David |
||
|Requirements= <br> |
|Requirements= <br> |
||
Overview. This feature is designed to address the persistent requests to run more applications. An alternative approach would be the "easy sugarization" feature above. This implementation is currently preferred because it also helps us get all the XO software "upstream". That would bring in more developers and add flexibility for XO users. |
Overview. This feature is designed to address the persistent requests to run more applications. An alternative approach would be the "easy sugarization" feature above. This implementation is currently preferred because it also helps us get all the XO software "upstream". That would bring in more developers and add flexibility for XO users. |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
[ ] sugar.dat 18-Nov-2008 10:14 357M <br> |
[ ] sugar.dat 18-Nov-2008 10:14 357M <br> |
||
[ ] sugar.img 18-Nov-2008 10:13 239K <br> |
[ ] sugar.img 18-Nov-2008 10:13 239K <br> |
||
One possible solution. From this thread: http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2008-December/021904.html <br> |
|||
* yum groupinstall "GNOME Desktop Environment" <br> |
|||
I gave this a try with latest Joyride (2592), and get a couple of |
|||
depsolving problems. Maybe one of the RPM ninjas on fedora-olpc-list |
|||
could take a look at how we could resolve these? Alternatively, maybe |
|||
we should be hand-picking the list of packages to add, since I see some |
|||
deps in there we don't want, e.g.: |
|||
--> Processing Dependency: texlive = 2007-35.fc10 for package: kpathsea <br> |
|||
|Owners=Greg |
|||
--> Processing Dependency: httpd >= 2.2.0 for package: gnome-user-share <br> |
|||
Possibly useful tool for building Fedora images: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ApplianceTools |
|||
Kickstart file from Peter for Fedora 9: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/olpc/ |
|||
|Owners=Gregorio, PBRobinson, Erik |
|||
|Priority=1 |
|Priority=1 |
||
Line 48: | Line 63: | ||
|Target for 9.1=yes |
|Target for 9.1=yes |
||
}} |
}} |
||
[[Category:XO software and Fedora]] |
Latest revision as of 01:23, 9 February 2011
Feature subcategory | Is part of::Category:Linux and OS | |
Requesters | {{#arraymap:Ed, David|,|x|Requested by::x}} | |
Requirements | Overview. This feature is designed to address the persistent requests to run more applications. An alternative approach would be the "easy sugarization" feature above. This implementation is currently preferred because it also helps us get all the XO software "upstream". That would bring in more developers and add flexibility for XO users.
| |
Specification | From post by David Lang, http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2008-December/021548.html Sizes of recent window manager images:
I gave this a try with latest Joyride (2592), and get a couple of depsolving problems. Maybe one of the RPM ninjas on fedora-olpc-list could take a look at how we could resolve these? Alternatively, maybe we should be hand-picking the list of packages to add, since I see some deps in there we don't want, e.g.: --> Processing Dependency: texlive = 2007-35.fc10 for package: kpathsea Possibly useful tool for building Fedora images: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ApplianceTools Kickstart file from Peter for Fedora 9: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/olpc/ | |
Owners | {{#arraymap:Gregorio, PBRobinson, Erik|,|x|Contact person::User:x}} | |
Priority | Priority::1 | |
Helps deployability? | Helps deployability::yes | |
Target for 9.1? | Target for 9.1::yes |