Ask OLPC a Question/New: Difference between revisions
m (→School Gateways: fix link) |
Jordantryon (talk | contribs) m (Programming) |
||
Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
:As far as I know, OLPC keybords are standardized for each country's language/s, but not braille. The OLPC has [[Hardware specification#Specifications|3 USB ports]] to which external (braille) keyboards may be connected ([http://www.google.com/search?client=opera&rls=en&q=usb+braille+keyboard&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8 quick search] and [http://www.portset.co.uk/braillekey1.htm sample result] or [http://www.hooleon.com/menu-stickers-braille.htm?gclid=CNWevcfho4kCFSiANAodGG3twA alternative method]). In order to better gauge the dimension of the issue, the [http://www.who.int/ World Health Organization] (WHO) has some statistics on the [http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs282/en/ incidence of blindness]. |
:As far as I know, OLPC keybords are standardized for each country's language/s, but not braille. The OLPC has [[Hardware specification#Specifications|3 USB ports]] to which external (braille) keyboards may be connected ([http://www.google.com/search?client=opera&rls=en&q=usb+braille+keyboard&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8 quick search] and [http://www.portset.co.uk/braillekey1.htm sample result] or [http://www.hooleon.com/menu-stickers-braille.htm?gclid=CNWevcfho4kCFSiANAodGG3twA alternative method]). In order to better gauge the dimension of the issue, the [http://www.who.int/ World Health Organization] (WHO) has some statistics on the [http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs282/en/ incidence of blindness]. |
||
:I have posted some observations about [[Input methods#Dasher - gesture text entry|Dasher]] as an alternative [[Input methods|input method]], not only for physical disabilities but general use too. --[[User:Xavi|Xavi]] 09:45, 21 December 2006 (EST) |
:I have posted some observations about [[Input methods#Dasher - gesture text entry|Dasher]] as an alternative [[Input methods|input method]], not only for physical disabilities but general use too. --[[User:Xavi|Xavi]] 09:45, 21 December 2006 (EST) |
||
== Programming == |
|||
Does the os suport basic programming. |
Revision as of 17:57, 27 December 2006
This section is for new questions for OLPC. Please read through Ask OLPC a Question before adding a question here.
Image about the World Summit in Tunisia, showing Nicholas Negroponte and Kofi Annan when presenting the laptop
Hello, I am writing an article in the german Wikipedia on the "100-Dollar-Laptop" aka "Children's Machine" (link: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/100-Dollar-Laptop). I would like to add an image showing Nicholas Negroponte and Kofi Annan in Tunisia on the World Summit. Unfortunately on flickr there is no photo, which is compatible zu the gnu-licence. Only Creative Commons 2.5. with the right of commercial use and of course the gnu-licence are allowed to be uploaded in Wikipedia.
Do you have such a picture in your portfolio? Can you upload this picture with compatible licence on Wikipedia?
In my opinion such a picture would have positive impact on OLPC's image. If you google for "Children's Machine" the german Wikipedia-article has the best page rank. You can contact me on the german Wikipedia, search word "Betbuster".
Thanks, Wikipedia user: Betbuster 134.2.57.213 09:20, 19 December 2006 (EST)
School Gateways
I've looked around the site for a while and cannot find much about gateways at the schools. Can somebody tell me about the connectivity to the internet for the whole mesh network through gateways at schools? I'm especially interested in what the power requirements will be for a gateway, because I'm hoping to find out how hard it would be to set one up in an area where there is no electricity. Thank you!
- The OLPC networking concept is not Internet-based. We assume that there will be no Internet connectivity and no Internet gateways. The laptops are being deployed into countries which do not have a lot of native-language content available on the Internet. The networking focus is to make sure that the laptops will be able to communicate with each other over a larger than normal area, and that they will be able to communicate with resources in the school. In most cases, these school resources will not be Internet gateways but will be more like a cross between a library and an FTP site with content that kids can download to their laptops. Of course some schools will have Internet access and may copy Internet content for use by the kids, but the laptops are not intended to be used for direct Internet surfing.
- In regard to your questions about power, you may wish to read the Battery and power page for tips.
Technology innovation is moving at a very rapid pace
How are you guys planning for the future. How are you guys preparing for the technology currently planned to be used inside the laptop becoming absolete. What is your turnaround time between parts going into production and actually being distributed to the people? --314159271828 01:55, 4 December 2006 (EST)
Maximum Altitude Spec
According to the Hardware specification the Maximum altitude: -15m to 3048m (14.7 to 10.1 psia) (operating), -15m to 12192m (14.7 to 4.4 psia) (non-operating... would it be possible to operate (safely) above that altitude? After all, in the Andes (and I'll assume the Himalayas) many people live higher... El Alto 4150m, Potosi 3967m, etc... --Xavi 12:47, 30 November 2006 (EST)
Usability and User Testing
There is very little public information about requirements gathering, usability and user testing. In other words, how do you know whether the OLPC (i) will meet your users' needs and (ii) is easy enough for them to use? Have the target user groups been characterized? What ongoing plans do you have for this? I`d Like test the OLPC in Argentina, Please contct with me to know how. Thanks.
- As far as I know, there are two local groups in Argentina with test boards (don't know if anybody has the 2B1/XO prototypes though). They are Ututo and Tuquito. I know Ututo had some explicit arrangements to let other people use/test the boards. If anybody knows about other groups (or about any local XOs) please let me know (or post in the OLPC Argentina pages. --Xavi 07:23, 6 December 2006 (EST)
Deployment Criteria & Metrics
Although these issues are basically 'national' prerogatives, is there anything being done at the OLPC level? In many countries, 1 million laptops will either be too little or too much. All along, before, during and after the deployment they should be able to assess the result of the effort (metrics), be it to keep the course, or change things, or try new things, etc.
- We do not believe there is such a thing as too little. In countries where 1 million laptops is too many, we won't be able to do an early deployment, but we do expect that after a few million units are in the field, there will be other organizations who will deploy smaller quantities to smaller countries, such as many island nations. In fact, Libya has announced their intention to buy laptops for some poorer African nations.
- I think that spanish speaking latin american countries do fit in a gray-zone there; there are many that individually would have to wait for later stages, but together they could probably put something - ie: central american countries.
- As far ans metrics are concerned, we take that very seriously both in the design of the laptops and in the whole deployment process. We are constantly measuring, analysing and making course corrections based on the data. We will continue to do so.
- Seriousness is good. Transparency too. :) I've somehow managed to reach the Pilot Projects#Diversity Matrix, which I find a bit shallow and unstructured for my taste, so I'm assuming that more structured guidelines are being thought out, planned and to be published, right? After all, as the proposers of the idea, the performance analysis and other measurements should be your domain of expertise. For example, which population segment is known to make the most out of the laptop experience? Is income considered a (key) factor? People with very-low, low, medium, high, or very-high income are 'all equal' or they somehow 'profit' differently in respect to their original educational levels? Under all circumstances?
- I'm well aware that these are mostly unanswered questions (I'm not looking for an answer here) and will be subject to many factors and variables; notwithstanding, what kind of information is being thought as necessary to evaluate or consider? All I'm asking is to be able to see the guidelines - and hopefully a way to collaborate.--Xavi 17:04, 9 December 2006 (EST)
Timor Leste (East Timor) not involved yet and how to get the process off on the right foot
I am a volunteer IT worker here in Dili. I wish to follow through on getting the Government/Min of Education involved. Is there a set of templates/docs/procedures for me to follow? If so, then I think that they would be very useful for other countries. thanks chris mansonc@usa.net
Social Benefit
How will OLPC benefit countries when the majority of children do not attend public school or public school is not available?
Mention was made in the NY Times article of a sponsorship program where people could fund a OLPC for a child in a target country. The quote was attributed to Nicholas N. How do we sign up?
Support for Self-Learners
I understand that you initially sell batches of at least 1 mio OLPC laptops to departments of education who distribute them to children going to public schools where trained teachers will put them to use applying localised curriculas. So far I can imagine quite well how OLPC hardware and software supports the kid's learning effort. This picture best matches developing countries such as OLPC's first subscribers rather than really poor 3rd world countries.
However, what about those children who cannot attend to schools and have no teachers, which is not uncommon in really poor 3rd world countries? I still cannot imagine how illiterate kids (probably having illiterate parents) teach themselves the usage of the OLPC laptop and moreover teach themselves basic reading, writing and math.
- Personally (can't talk for others) I've been working under the assumption that some level of schooling will be available so that reading and writing, although not necessarily a given, will be a guided process. Nevertheless, I think that the sound processing capabilities of the OLPC would be more than enough to have speech synthesis and text-to-speech allowing 'oral' tutoring and building language skills. These technologies could also be used as an opportunity to include kids with communication pathologies too.--Xavi 23:43, 19 December 2006 (EST)
- I can imagine that your idea with the sound and text-to-speech functionalities could work provided that localised software supporting it comes with the laptop. Such software would have to be automatically loaded and run in such a way that when you boot it up, it starts to talk and explain by itself. By the way, similar software could support self-learning foreign languages e.g. for better access to the internet content. However, as far as I know text-to-speech is only available yet for very few (mainly first world) languages. Are there already plans or efforts in this direction?
- I fear that as so often the poorest of the poor are left out because it is so much more difficult to help them having not the faintest bit of infrastructure. The OLPC project is a huge oportunity to them. OLPC has achieved already so much which seemed impossible that helping also the poorest finally appears feasible by supporting self-learning. This seems worth to be included in OLPC's project plans.
- I'm not a project team-member so whatever I say is not official. That said, I can only add that the goal of the project is to provide/propose to governments a laptop that is (financially) cheap enough to be massively distributed to kids while being powerful enough to do all sorts of things. It'll be upto those governments to decide how they'll be deployed, what content will be included (and/or developed), etc. In some target countries schooling is so widespread making your scenario a marginal one (but nevertheless important). In other countries, I agree, things are quite the opposite. An interesting reading is the Learning Vision and its reference to the CREATE project in Costa Rica, where some families moved into a town that had 1:1 computer education just so that their kids would have access to that kind of education. IOW, the population pro-actively flocked to that schooling system.
- The 'poorest of the poor' will always be marginal to central efforts, a sad truth. There are millions of kids in sub-optimal schooling systems today, and I find it extremely important to raise that level and the OLPC addresses it squarely. Without the OLPC, millions of kids will be left in the broad swath of population that today we call the 'third world'.
- One final thing to note, is that my idea for the "speaking-laptop that will teach a kid how to use it" is just that, an idea. The technical and pedagogical aspects of such a marvel... I can only guess...and dream. --Xavi 12:23, 20 December 2006 (EST)
- I start to get the picture now. I was a bit confused about the mission statement given in the front page of http://laptop.org saying: "Introducing the children's laptop from One Laptop per Child — a potent learning tool created expressly for the world's poorest children living in its most remote environments." Probably I understood it too literally.
- The OLPC laptop in the present form and with the presently available software seems useful mainly in areas where kids already have access to schools and teachers. This mainly covers developing countries rather than the even far poorer 3rd world countries which probably could not afford to buy OLPC laptops in large quantity anyway. Even if they received those laptops for free they could not make good use of it because they hardly have schools and teachers to tutor the majority of the childern in using them. Don't get me wrong. Each child getting a better education - no matter where - is a gain for all of us on this planet. The OLPC project is well under way to take this cause a great leap ahead. I was just confused thinking that the mission statement really meant "the world's poorest children" and I was trying to find out how this is intended to be achieved.
- If things go somewhere according to plan, the result will be millions of kids with a real chance at education where there was barely any (or parody of). And that for me, is not just 'good enough', it's 'not perfect but darn good'!
- BTW, "poorest" and "remotest" are terms that are hard to translate into a homogeneous reality. Who is poorer? A homeless in say, Miami, or one in Maputo? I consider Istambul a remote place, but I doubt somebody in Ankara would agree with me. Is distance the factor? Or the time it takes to get there? Or a relative/subjective mix? --Xavi 09:01, 21 December 2006 (EST)
- My main questions are answered. I shortened both questions and answers a bit for the benefit of future readers. The emerging discussion might better be continued in a discussion section like the community portal of this wiki. --Roleic 20:25, 22 December 2006 (CET)
Accessibility
What mechanism olpc is going to adopt to make it accessable for child with physical disabilities? Will there be seperate keyboards for blind with braile? Will there be alternate input methods for child with dysfunctioning hands?
--Ankur Sharma, olpc Nepal (ankur@olpcnepal.org)
- As far as I know, OLPC keybords are standardized for each country's language/s, but not braille. The OLPC has 3 USB ports to which external (braille) keyboards may be connected (quick search and sample result or alternative method). In order to better gauge the dimension of the issue, the World Health Organization (WHO) has some statistics on the incidence of blindness.
- I have posted some observations about Dasher as an alternative input method, not only for physical disabilities but general use too. --Xavi 09:45, 21 December 2006 (EST)
Programming
Does the os suport basic programming.