OLPC:Administrators: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(where are our readers?) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* I've been doing some reworks with the [[Ask OLPC a Question]] area (mainly writing up /Summary pages for the [[... about XXX]] pages). The selection of questions (and body of the answer) could use some OLPC staff member to review their correctness. comments? should those /Summary pages be protected? if yes, only to registered users or exclusively admins? |
* I've been doing some reworks with the [[Ask OLPC a Question]] area (mainly writing up /Summary pages for the [[... about XXX]] pages). The selection of questions (and body of the answer) could use some OLPC staff member to review their correctness. comments? should those /Summary pages be protected? if yes, only to registered users or exclusively admins? |
||
*: No need to protect them; just keep an eye on them. I try not to protect anything until some vandal starts to make them unusable. |
*: No need to protect them; just keep an eye on them. I try not to protect anything until some vandal starts to make them unusable. |
||
== Where are our readers from? == |
|||
Some time ago (technically last year ;) I raised the question about who's reading what - and more importantly (for me) from where. (See [[Talk:The_OLPC_Wiki#Visitor statistics|here]]). |
|||
My question originates in that knowing that kind of information we may be able either to tune content or promote/demote links in the front page, faq, etc. For example, if I knew that it was argies rarely visit Argentina's page, it could mean that they are looking for other kind of news, data, whatever; but at least I'd know they aren't reading it - maybe it's just lack of local diffusion.--[[User:Xavi|Xavi]] 20:49, 20 January 2007 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 01:49, 21 January 2007
Some notes for administrators.
- is there an admin-list or similar?
- if not, is there a de-facto place in the wiki to coordinate?
- This one!
- I've been patrolling the general edits, does it help? I try not to patrol technical and similar edits that may compromise the hardware/software builds, etc
- Yes, it helps.
- I'm trying to categorize the site, and was thinking that Wikipedia's handling of subcategories as expandable lists would be a nice extension to have in order to avoid content being lost deep within sub-categories (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Computer_architecture)
- Ahh, interesting point. We should do this. 18.85.18.138
- I've been doing some reworks with the Ask OLPC a Question area (mainly writing up /Summary pages for the ... about XXX pages). The selection of questions (and body of the answer) could use some OLPC staff member to review their correctness. comments? should those /Summary pages be protected? if yes, only to registered users or exclusively admins?
- No need to protect them; just keep an eye on them. I try not to protect anything until some vandal starts to make them unusable.
Where are our readers from?
Some time ago (technically last year ;) I raised the question about who's reading what - and more importantly (for me) from where. (See here).
My question originates in that knowing that kind of information we may be able either to tune content or promote/demote links in the front page, faq, etc. For example, if I knew that it was argies rarely visit Argentina's page, it could mean that they are looking for other kind of news, data, whatever; but at least I'd know they aren't reading it - maybe it's just lack of local diffusion.--Xavi 20:49, 20 January 2007 (EST)