IMSA Service Model Research Project: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 18: Line 18:


==People==
==People==
[[User:kcrews|Kevin]] and the other fine folks at the [[IMSA|IMSA Chapter]]
[[User:kcrews|Kevin]], [[User:ahw|April-Hope]] and the other fine folks at the [[IMSA|IMSA Chapter]].

Revision as of 17:19, 6 March 2008

Problem Statement

Acknowledging the lack of a repair model for the G1 launch in the United States, as well as foreseeing difficulties in many of the G1 launch communities world-wide, we, the students of the Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy OLPC Chapter, hereby propose a short term research project to identify repair problems and propose effective methods for developing educationally based repair centers world wide.

Proposal

Model

We propose a multi-track repair model. One track will go directly through the chapter—n [number] of machines will be assessed, diagnosed, and repaired by members of the chapter. Another track will go through classes—the Computer Science and Emerging Technology and/or the Electronics students will assess, diagnose and repair machines. The remaining n machines will be repaired by students together with local engineers and computer scientists. Members and non-members of the chapter will be partnered up with professionals to assess, diagnose and repair the machines.

We hope to base the model off of what we believe will happen when XOs need to be fixed outside of the US. We are working to make the reparis student led (for more information on student-led support, ask April-Hope. This way, we can use our findings to help schools that are not in a place to get instant repairs.

Time line

It is our hope to complete the repairs and log all the relevant data by the end of the 2007-2008 school year. This means that by May, 31 2008, we will have completed all possible repairs and entered all the data into a database. At this time, we will begin the write-up of our methods, results and findings.

Write-up

We will write up our methods, results, and findings as well as propose an effective model (or two or three) for a repair center. We will target the write-up to other educational institutions in the US and worldwide. It is our hope that this study will help others decide to build their own repair centers and help them model them. We also want to propose a list of must-haves on a greater scale for any sort of grass roots repair model to work.

Questions

  • What number makes this test significant?
  • How do we get parts?
  • Can we translate this into many languages?

People

Kevin, April-Hope and the other fine folks at the IMSA Chapter.