IMSA Service Model Research Project: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Model) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
We have requested 10 broken machines and 2 hopeless machines, as of now, to begin our project with. That means our ''n'' is now 12. |
We have requested 10 broken machines and 2 hopeless machines, as of now, to begin our project with. That means our ''n'' is now 12. |
||
===Working together=== |
|||
If you/your community are also participating in this project, we would love if you would help us by providing us with information on each repair case. We would like to compile diagnostic and repair methodology from as many centers for as many XOs as we can. All of this information will be compiled into a research paper that will provide many local as well as global communities to start up their own repair centers based on our findings and discussion of models. |
|||
Please contact [[User:Kcrews|Kevin]] if you are interested in working with us. We would love to work with you! |
|||
===Time line=== |
===Time line=== |
Revision as of 02:54, 26 March 2008
Problem Statement
Acknowledging the lack of a repair model for the G1 launch in the United States, as well as foreseeing difficulties in many of the G1 launch communities world-wide, we, the students of the Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy OLPC Chapter, hereby propose a short term research project to identify repair problems and propose effective methods for developing educationally based repair centers world wide.
Proposal
Model
We propose a multi-track repair model. One track will go directly through the chapter—n [number] of machines will be assessed, diagnosed, and repaired by members of the chapter. Another track will go through classes—the Computer Science and Emerging Technology and/or the Electronics students will assess, diagnose and repair machines. The remaining n machines will be repaired by students together with local engineers and computer scientists. Members and non-members of the chapter will be partnered up with professionals to assess, diagnose and repair the machines.
We hope to base the model off of what we believe will happen when XOs need to be fixed outside of the US. We are working to make the reparis student led (for more information on student-led support, ask April-Hope. This way, we can use our findings to help schools that are not in a place to get instant repairs.
We have requested 10 broken machines and 2 hopeless machines, as of now, to begin our project with. That means our n is now 12.
Working together
If you/your community are also participating in this project, we would love if you would help us by providing us with information on each repair case. We would like to compile diagnostic and repair methodology from as many centers for as many XOs as we can. All of this information will be compiled into a research paper that will provide many local as well as global communities to start up their own repair centers based on our findings and discussion of models.
Please contact Kevin if you are interested in working with us. We would love to work with you!
Time line
It is our hope to complete the repairs and log all the relevant data by the end of the 2007-2008 school year. This means that by May, 31 2008, we will have completed all possible repairs and entered all the data into a database. At this time, we will begin the write-up of our methods, results and findings.
Write-up
We will write up our methods, results, and findings as well as propose an effective model (or two or three) for a repair center. We will target the write-up to other educational institutions in the US and worldwide. It is our hope that this study will help others decide to build their own repair centers and help them model them. We also want to propose a list of must-haves on a greater scale for any sort of grass roots repair model to work.
We will have each student that does a repair fill out a 'file' on each XO and will format one section of the paper like a case study. This will include the diagnostic approach, findings, methods of repair, assistance, things to be done differently for future repairs and any other notes. Then, we will also look at a somewhat quantitative study of success, working with other repair test centers (more on this later) to include there data and distribute a report to all that participated.
It is our hope to have other centers participate in the research methodology of our inquiry, using forms we are generating and giving us access to the 'case studies' they conduct. We will, of course, give credit to all and publish a very helpful repair center manual that can be distributed globally as the small G1 communities begin to emerge.
Questions
- What number makes this test significant?
- How do we get parts?
- Can we translate this into many languages?
People
Kevin, April-Hope and the other fine folks at the IMSA Chapter.