Talk:Adobe Flash: Difference between revisions
Annegentle (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
== Capability of a the flash player on the XO == |
== Capability of a the flash player on the XO == |
||
I have a B4 XO. What is the maximum .swf file size that the flashplayer can play on the XO? I could play .swf files up to 50 kb with acceptable performance. Is there anyway that the flash player on the XO can play a .swf file which is 2 to 3 MBs large? |
I have a B4 XO. What is the maximum .swf file size that the flashplayer can play on the XO? I could play .swf files up to 50 kb with acceptable performance. Is there anyway that the flash player on the XO can play a .swf file which is 2 to 3 MBs large? |
||
> Does Flash lite work on the XO as yet? |
|||
Flash Lite 1.1 (based on Flash 4) and Flash Lite 2.0 (based on Flash 7) content run pretty good on the XO with Flash 9 or 10 beta installed. Performance is more or less the same as that on a Nokia Series 60 feature pack 3 Flash Lite-enabled phone. -[[user:Object404|Naz]] |
|||
== Webcam functionality == |
== Webcam functionality == |
Revision as of 11:49, 24 September 2008
Can't get it to work
These instructions didn't seem to work - Gnash is still used on all Flash webpages. For those of us who do not know how to replace gnash with flash, a quick note from an expert would be greatly appreciated.
- The original instructions for Adobe Flash installation allowed for a local user installation as an alternative to the system installation. An advantage of a local user installation is it doesn't not have to be re-installed after a standard upgrade. A disadvantage is that Gnash, a system installation, seemed to override the Flash installation in Browse. Katie 06:09, 5 January 2008 (EST)
run as root
That command didn't work for me either. Running 'sudo' just gives an error. I'm no unix expert, so I think there is a way to do it with one line like he was trying to say. But I was able to get it to work this way:
su - root
then type this
rpm -i http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/flash-plugin-9.0.115.0-release.i386.rpm
Forcing Adobe Flash to run in "low-quality" mode by default
Many G1G1 users who have installed Adobe Flash report improved performance with this edit to the flash binary, which forces the plugin to run in "low-quality" mode by default.
cd /usr/lib/flash-plugin cp libflashplayer.so libflashplayer.so.bak && sed -i 's/HIGH/LOW/g' libflashplayer.so && sed -i 's/LOW/HIGH/' libflashplayer.so
Found at: http://olpcnews.com/forum/index.php?topic=845.0. The poster there credits http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-543747.html .
- ~ Hexagonal 17:02, 4 January 2008 (EST)
Flash and Gnash Conflict
I'm working with the two laptops I got for my kids.
I installed Adobe Flash and have noticed on www.pbskids.org that some of the games seem to be trying to run in Gnash and Flash at the same time now. Anyone know how to uninstall Gnash? Is that safe?
Carey Cranston--New Dad to the community.
- Installing Adobe Flash will not do irreparable harm to your system. No need to uninstall Gnash. --Walter 14:28, 6 January 2008 (EST)
Not sure what I am doing but trying to figure it out for my daughter who received as a gift. Forgive me if my question is in the wrong place. I somehow installed the wrong Adobe version by just clicking the link and I can't figure out how to fix it. The instructions do not help since the terms are foreign to me. I am worried that if I find the "terminal" and uninstall, I will do more damage. Any suggestions? Is there someone in the NYC area I can hire for assistance?
- If you installed the wrong version, then you can just reinstall the correct version by using the --force option. e.g.,
rpm -i -v --nodeps --force flash-plugin-9.0.115.0-release.i386.rpm
--Walter 14:28, 6 January 2008 (EST)
installing adobe
thanks walter!! when i open the terminal there are characters on the first line. do i type the characters you gave me underneath the ones that are already there? or do i erase them and type the installation language instead?
A good question, I could see how that would be confusing. Here's what I know - the characters on the first line when you start the Terminal are called a "prompt" - it lets you know who you're logged in as, (your user name), the name of the machine you're working on, and some indication where you are in the directory/folder structure. You can't delete those characters. When you log in as root, those characters change to "bash 3.2 #" or some such, but they are still a prompt only, not deletable. So you type the commands after the prompt. I hope this helps! annegentle 02:44, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Disabling Gnash
I installed Adobe Flash in /home/olpc/.mozilla, and like others found that both Adobe Flash and Gnash were installed (according to about:plugins), but that Gnash was handling any Flash animations. I disabled Gnash by doing this:
mv /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libgnashplugin.so /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libgnashplugin.so.disabled
When I upgraded from build 650 to build 653, Adobe Flash was still installed, but the change above (disabling Gnash) had been reversed, and I had to do it again.
Mouse Cursors
Is there any easy way (e.g. X resource) to change the mouse cursor to something larger, preferably the standard Sugar cursor?
Yes, at least on build-656 the default icon theme needs to be changed from Bluecurve to sugar:
su -l cd /usr/share/icons/default cp index.theme index.theme.bak && sed -i 's/Bluecurve/sugar/' index.theme
Restart X by pressing ctrl-alt-erase. Thunder 05:54, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
segfault on right click
With Adobe Flash 9.0.r48, right-clicking on a flash animation would cause a segmentation fault for both Browse and Firefox on the XO. This is fixed with Adobe Flash player version 9.0.r115.
Notlong URLs?
I'm not sure it's a good idea to advocate installing software from "notlong.com" URLs, especially as root. Yes, it's more convenient, but there is considerable potential for abuse. Not only does it assume that the database at notlong.com is secure, but it also makes it harder to detect a malicious person inserting his own notlong.com URL (or preregistering typo URLs or future versions). —Joe 15:23, 14 January 2008 (EST)
Capability of a the flash player on the XO
I have a B4 XO. What is the maximum .swf file size that the flashplayer can play on the XO? I could play .swf files up to 50 kb with acceptable performance. Is there anyway that the flash player on the XO can play a .swf file which is 2 to 3 MBs large?
> Does Flash lite work on the XO as yet? Flash Lite 1.1 (based on Flash 4) and Flash Lite 2.0 (based on Flash 7) content run pretty good on the XO with Flash 9 or 10 beta installed. Performance is more or less the same as that on a Nokia Series 60 feature pack 3 Flash Lite-enabled phone. -Naz
Webcam functionality
Webcam functionality of adobe flash player just seems to spew out a black box on the XO... could this have to do with adobe's usage of v4l1 instead of v4l2? It successfully detects the camera, but all video is just black.
"file not available"
I'm one of the g1g1 recievers and I can't get this download to come out. I followed the commands exactly and I have problems with the "wget" command. it connects to the internet, recgonizes the alias, and says file not there. I followed the link on the page and downloaded it through there and ran the final command but it wouldn't run saying it still wasn't there.
Opera-compatible flash version (048) no longer on adobe site
Today (14 May 2008) I tried downloading the 048 flash version and got a 404 not found error. It looks like Adobe took it off their site. If you download the 100MB archive of old fp9 versions, there is still a .tar of the 048 version available. Ugh.
If someone has a fix for this I hope they edit the instructions, and feel free to delete this entry if the problem gets resolved.
Using Flash in both Opera and Browse - can you have two versions installed?
Back on March 31st, I followed the instructions on this page and installed flash twice - once for Browse (ver 115) and once for Opera (ver 48). (I found the ver. 48 today - so maybe that's been fixed?) Since then, I've done secure upgrades, including one to 708 yesterday. This page now offers the 124 version of Flash as the newest for Browse, and 48 for Opera. However, installing them both is not possible (124 has files that don't work with 48 - drat.) So, I try to uninstall as noted here on the page, but....
Uninstall is not working for Flash
as of 8/18/2008 - I get the following error when I run this command (it's the same for all versions.) Any help on this one?
snipped from Terminal ------
-bash-3.2# yum remove flash-plugin-9.0.124.0-release
Setting up Remove Process
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/olpc2-update1-current/i386/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404: Not Found
Trying other mirror.
Error: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository: olpc_koji-update1. Please verify its path and try again
FYI - I checked the Linux Flash support pages at adobe.com and found the simple delete option. I'll try this later tonight. - 8/19/2008 g1g1pdx
Removal instructions
Manual removal (for users who installed the plug-in via Install script): Delete libflashplayer.so binary and flashplayer.xpt file in directory /home/<user>/.mozilla/plugins/
RPM removal:
As root, enter in terminal:
- rpm -e flash-plugin
Click Enter and follow prompts
Hope this helps others....