ECO/8.2.0/Checklist: Difference between revisions
m (→Other signoffs) |
(→Test) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Test== |
==Test== |
||
''This section should be completed by the QA lead.'' |
''This section should be completed by the QA lead.'' |
||
Build tested: |
Build tested: 763 |
||
Checklist |
Checklist |
||
Specific issue testing: |
Specific issue testing: [[Test_cases_8.2.0]], [[TestResults_8.2.0]] |
||
[[1 hour smoke test]]: |
[[1 hour smoke test]]: _x__ |
||
[[Clean install]]: |
[[Clean install]]: _x__ |
||
Upgrade testing: |
Upgrade testing: _x__ List builds tested from: 656, 703, 708, 760 |
||
Downgrade testing: |
Downgrade testing: _n/a*__ List builds tested to: |
||
Tested on C2 and C3: |
Tested on C2 and C3: _x__ |
||
Tested on NiMH batteries: ___ |
Tested on NiMH batteries: ___ |
||
Tested on en_US |
Tested on en_US _**__ * the degree of l10n/i18n for *'d keyboards and locales |
||
es_* ___ * will be considered by the [[release team]] in their judgements. |
es_* ___ * will be considered by the [[release team]] in their judgements. |
||
mn_MN ___ * |
mn_MN ___ * |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
pt_BR ___ |
pt_BR ___ |
||
??? ___ |
??? ___ |
||
Open, WEP, and WPA APs tested: |
Open, WEP, and WPA APs tested: __x_ List brands, if appropriate: in house APs |
||
Field testing, if possible: ___ |
Field testing, if possible: ___ |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
Additional comments, if any: |
Additional comments, if any: |
||
* there is no downgrade; you must cleaninstall to an older version |
|||
** See [[TestResults_8.2.0]] for information on what keyboards were tested, and the test that was don |
|||
==Signature== |
==Signature== |
Revision as of 14:34, 25 September 2008
This page lists the sign-offs required to advance through the software release process. Consult that page for additional details on each step and sign-off.
Proposal/Review
This section should be completed by the Triage team.
ECO Name: ECO/8.2.0 ECO Target date: September, 2008 (slipped from August) ECO Champion: Michael Stone Proposal approved: (date and Triage team signature) March, 2008 --Michael Stone 22:16, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Candidate build
This section should be completed by the build master.
Build number: ???
Test
This section should be completed by the QA lead.
Build tested: 763 Checklist Specific issue testing: Test_cases_8.2.0, TestResults_8.2.0 1 hour smoke test: _x__ Clean install: _x__ Upgrade testing: _x__ List builds tested from: 656, 703, 708, 760 Downgrade testing: _n/a*__ List builds tested to: Tested on C2 and C3: _x__ Tested on NiMH batteries: ___ Tested on en_US _**__ * the degree of l10n/i18n for *'d keyboards and locales es_* ___ * will be considered by the release team in their judgements. mn_MN ___ * ht_HT ___ * fr_RW ___ * note: while there are many Spanish and Arabic locales, rw_RW ___ * we don't yet distinguish between them. am_ET ___ * ar_* ___ kh_CA ___ fa_AF ___ hi_HI ___ pt_BR ___ ??? ___ Open, WEP, and WPA APs tested: __x_ List brands, if appropriate: in house APs Field testing, if possible: ___
Release to signature/final test: (date and QA lead signature) _____________________________________________________________ Additional comments, if any:
* there is no downgrade; you must cleaninstall to an older version ** See TestResults_8.2.0 for information on what keyboards were tested, and the test that was don
Signature
This section should be completed by the security team.
Build to be signed: Keys to be used: Security-critical components olpcrd version (rpm -q olpcrd): Signed off by/date: ________________________________________ Firmware/OFW version (/ofw/openprom/model; check against rpm -q bootfw): Signed off by/date: ________________________________________ Firmware/EC version: (/ofw/ec-name): Signed off by/date: _Rsmith 22:53, 17 September 2008 (UTC) Kernel version: (uname -r): Signed off by/date: ________________________________________
Signatures above certify that, to the best of your knowledge, the above components are at least as secure as other components signed with these keys.
This section should be completed by the build engineer.
Checklist Appropriate sign-offs present above: ___ Versions in build match those approved above: ___ QA lead sign-off under 'Test' above: ___ Packages in build match those expected: ___ Checklist sign-off: (date and build master signature) _____________________________________________________________
Other signoffs
Upon or after announcement of the Signed Candidate:
Documentation signoff: ___ support lead Activities signoff: ___ build engineer Licensing signoff: ___ compliance consultant
The licensing signoff signifies that, to the best of the signatory's knowledge, "OLPC's compliance with its obligations under free software licenses is better in this release than in its previous most-compliant release."
One week after announcement of the Signed Candidate:
One week of testing has elapsed: ___ release team No untriaged bugs: ___ triage team No blocks:8.2.0 bugs: ___ triage team Release notes are approved: ___ product management lead
Final test
This section should be completed by the QA lead.
Build tested: Checklist 1 hour smoke test: ___ (catch signature process regressions) USB stick fresh install on wp laptop: ___ USB stick upgrade on wp laptop: ___ Network upgrade on wp: ___ Other testing (describe):
Sign-off for release: (date and QA lead signature) _____________________________________________________________
This section should be completed by the release team.
Approved build number: OS version: Firmware/OFW version: Firmware/EC version: Wireless firmware version: Champion sign off: (date and champion signature) _____________________________________________________________
Release team final sign off on ECO: (date and release team signature) _____________________________________________________________
Given three signatures above, the candidate build can be published as official.