Feature roadmap/Rebase on Fedora 10: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
|Specification=
|Specification=


|Owners=None yet.
|Owners=


|Priority=1
|Priority=1

Revision as of 15:28, 17 December 2008

Feature subcategory Is part of::Category:Linux and OS
Requesters {{#arraymap:Ed|,|x|Requested by::x}}
Requirements
  • XO release 8.2 contains a list of packages (some forked and some not). For must 9.1.0 we must update all packages to their Fedora 10 versions and re-apply XO specific changes, as needed, to the new Fedora 10 package.
  • Every package should also be included upstream. If that has not been completed in time for this release, every package must at a minimum have a plan for how it will get included upstream. This must include at a minimum an e-mail exchange with the package.
  • Must measure the NAND and memory usage vs 8.2. Any significant (not precisely defined as >1%) change in memory or NAND space in comparison to 8.2, must be reviewed.
  • Must not include any Fedora 9 or earlier packages (unless they haven't changed).
  • Should create tools to manage forked packages better. To start with: a notification tool to let us know if a new upstream release has occurred for a package we have forked. (Scott suggestion). See also thread by Scott at: http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2008-October/020411.html
Specification
Owners {{#arraymap:|,|x|Contact person::User:x}} Please indicate developers or champions supporting this request
Priority Priority::1
Helps deployability? Helps deployability::yes
Target for 9.1? Target for 9.1::yes