Talk:Japanese: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Unicode controversy) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The claim that Unicode round-trip conversion doesn't work is strongly contested by those who work in Unicode. Whoever made this claim needs to give or point to an example of failure. |
The claim that Unicode round-trip conversion doesn't work is strongly contested by those who work in Unicode. Whoever made this claim needs to give or point to an example of failure. |
||
There is no evidence that new Kanji words, invented in Japan, have been "exported back to China." Modern Mandarin Chinese does not use any Hanzi created in Japan. |
|||
The first line of this article should be edited to reflect this. |
Revision as of 16:15, 1 January 2007
The claim that Unicode round-trip conversion doesn't work is strongly contested by those who work in Unicode. Whoever made this claim needs to give or point to an example of failure.
There is no evidence that new Kanji words, invented in Japan, have been "exported back to China." Modern Mandarin Chinese does not use any Hanzi created in Japan.
The first line of this article should be edited to reflect this.