Talk:School server: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Reply about info status) |
(just wondering if my classification was 'correct') |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Given that there are OLPC plans for the servers, this page should '''clearly''' state the origin of its content: community or OLPC. --[[User:Xavi|Xavi]] 09:34, 27 January 2007 (EST) |
Given that there are OLPC plans for the servers, this page should '''clearly''' state the origin of its content: community or OLPC. --[[User:Xavi|Xavi]] 09:34, 27 January 2007 (EST) |
||
This page (the XS_Server_* pages) are currently ramblings (hence not referenced from a higher level), which over time have some decent chance of becoming official. |
:This page (the XS_Server_* pages) are currently ramblings (hence not referenced from a higher level), which over time have some decent chance of becoming official. |
||
I'm new to these parts, can you explain why the origin of the information must be stated ? |
:I'm new to these parts, can you explain why the origin of the information must be stated ? --[[User:wad|wad]] |
||
--[[User:wad|wad]] |
|||
::I was just wondering if my classification was 'correct'... :) I had heard 'rumors' about the server and its 'soon more info'... |
|||
::Thus the 'origin' question: 'idea' or 'fact'? Personally, I take 'ideas' pages as that, ideas--without any concrete implications. While non-ideas pages have a bit more 'weight' on the subject. But that's my PoV... and of course, material is not consistently edited :) --[[User:Xavi|Xavi]] 00:50, 28 January 2007 (EST) |
Revision as of 05:50, 28 January 2007
Status of this info
What is the status of the info in this page? User ramblings or OLPC page?
At first it seemed to fit the Category:Hardware ideas, but the use of XS & XSX names seems to hint or plays into some kind of officiality... although it doesn't give the impression of being so.
Given that there are OLPC plans for the servers, this page should clearly state the origin of its content: community or OLPC. --Xavi 09:34, 27 January 2007 (EST)
- This page (the XS_Server_* pages) are currently ramblings (hence not referenced from a higher level), which over time have some decent chance of becoming official.
- I'm new to these parts, can you explain why the origin of the information must be stated ? --wad
- I was just wondering if my classification was 'correct'... :) I had heard 'rumors' about the server and its 'soon more info'...
- Thus the 'origin' question: 'idea' or 'fact'? Personally, I take 'ideas' pages as that, ideas--without any concrete implications. While non-ideas pages have a bit more 'weight' on the subject. But that's my PoV... and of course, material is not consistently edited :) --Xavi 00:50, 28 January 2007 (EST)