Talk:School server: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(just wondering if my classification was 'correct') |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::I was just wondering if my classification was 'correct'... :) I had heard 'rumors' about the server and its 'soon more info'... |
::I was just wondering if my classification was 'correct'... :) I had heard 'rumors' about the server and its 'soon more info'... |
||
::Thus the 'origin' question: 'idea' or 'fact'? Personally, I take 'ideas' pages as that, ideas--without any concrete implications. While non-ideas pages have a bit more 'weight' on the subject. But that's my PoV... and of course, material is not consistently edited :) --[[User:Xavi|Xavi]] 00:50, 28 January 2007 (EST) |
::Thus the 'origin' question: 'idea' or 'fact'? Personally, I take 'ideas' pages as that, ideas--without any concrete implications. While non-ideas pages have a bit more 'weight' on the subject. But that's my PoV... and of course, material is not consistently edited :) --[[User:Xavi|Xavi]] 00:50, 28 January 2007 (EST) |
||
::All 'facts' begin as 'ideas'. You stumbled on a set of questions being posed, which I hope will blossom into 'facts'. The wiki is being used so that these questions can be discussed and edited by interested members of the community. --[[User:wad|wad]] 1/28/07 |
|||
Revision as of 07:41, 28 January 2007
Status of this info
What is the status of the info in this page? User ramblings or OLPC page?
At first it seemed to fit the Category:Hardware ideas, but the use of XS & XSX names seems to hint or plays into some kind of officiality... although it doesn't give the impression of being so.
Given that there are OLPC plans for the servers, this page should clearly state the origin of its content: community or OLPC. --Xavi 09:34, 27 January 2007 (EST)
- This page (the XS_Server_* pages) are currently ramblings (hence not referenced from a higher level), which over time have some decent chance of becoming official.
- I'm new to these parts, can you explain why the origin of the information must be stated ? --wad
- I was just wondering if my classification was 'correct'... :) I had heard 'rumors' about the server and its 'soon more info'...
- Thus the 'origin' question: 'idea' or 'fact'? Personally, I take 'ideas' pages as that, ideas--without any concrete implications. While non-ideas pages have a bit more 'weight' on the subject. But that's my PoV... and of course, material is not consistently edited :) --Xavi 00:50, 28 January 2007 (EST)
- All 'facts' begin as 'ideas'. You stumbled on a set of questions being posed, which I hope will blossom into 'facts'. The wiki is being used so that these questions can be discussed and edited by interested members of the community. --wad 1/28/07