Sample Maine e-mail: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
Dear (insert senator or reps name http://www.maine.gov/legis/house/townlist.htm),
Dear (insert senator or reps name http://www.maine.gov/legis/house/townlist.htm),


I am writing to ask for your support of the updated Rule 33 governing the use of physical restraint and seclusion in Maine schools. When fully implemented, the new rules will make a big difference for all individuals, but especially for children with special needs.
I am writing to ask your support for the updated Rule 33 governing on the use of physical restraint and seclusion in Maine schools. The new rules make a big difference for all kids, especially children with special needs.


Restraint and seclusion create a huge risk for injury to the child and adults involved. They also create psychological problems, including trauma, in young children. Children can learn their caregivers will place them in ‘scary’ situations, which impairs the development of safe relationships. Children may also associate their classrooms with invasive and traumatic experiences.
Restraint and seclusion create a huge risk for injury to the child and adults involved. They also create psychological problems, including trauma, in young children. Children can learn their caregivers will place them in ‘scary’ situations and they can associate school with invasive and traumatic experiences.


Restraint and seclusion have no therapeutic benefit. Therefore, children’s behaviors may remain unchanged and teachers may end up using more forceful, intrusive behavior-control procedures. The likelihood that circumstances may occur over and over again in the same way is both negative and disturbing for the child, with no positive outcomes. When restraint and seclusion are used to control behavior, such procedures may over time become the “normal” or routine practices in the classroom. With continued implementation of restraint and seclusion, the risk of abuse is dramatically heightened.
Restraint and seclusion have no therapeutic benefit. When children’s behaviors don't improve, teachers may use more forceful behavior-control procedures. Such procedures may over time become the “normal” or routine practices in the classroom. With continued implementation of restraint and seclusion, the risk of abuse is dramatically heightened.


In short, restraint and seclusion are not safe or effective methods for helping children and teachers. The alternative, positive behavioral intervention and support (see http://www.pbis.org/) has been proven effective in many school systems around the country. In addition to helping children with behavioral challenges, PBIS improves the school environment for all children.
The alternative, positive behavioral intervention and support (see http://www.pbis.org/) has been proven effective in school systems around the country. PBIS improves the school environment for all children.


The updated Rule 33 was created for all individuals in Maine schools to feel safe. I urge you to support its continued implementation and to support training programs which help teachers learn to use the effective alternatives to restraint and seclusion.
The updated Rule 33 was created to help all people feel safe in Maine schools. I urge you to support its continued implementation and to support training programs for its effective implementation.


Thank you,
Thank you,


[your name and address]
[your name and address]

---


Note: this was adapted from the Issue Brief found here: http://www.challengingbehavior.org/do/resources/documents/brief_preventing.pdf
Note: this was adapted from the Issue Brief found here: http://www.challengingbehavior.org/do/resources/documents/brief_preventing.pdf

Revision as of 21:48, 28 January 2013

Back to PAPPI Home: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/PAPPI

Any Maine resident, please send this e-mail to your legislator:

Dear (insert senator or reps name http://www.maine.gov/legis/house/townlist.htm),

I am writing to ask your support for the updated Rule 33 governing on the use of physical restraint and seclusion in Maine schools. The new rules make a big difference for all kids, especially children with special needs.

Restraint and seclusion create a huge risk for injury to the child and adults involved. They also create psychological problems, including trauma, in young children. Children can learn their caregivers will place them in ‘scary’ situations and they can associate school with invasive and traumatic experiences.

Restraint and seclusion have no therapeutic benefit. When children’s behaviors don't improve, teachers may use more forceful behavior-control procedures. Such procedures may over time become the “normal” or routine practices in the classroom. With continued implementation of restraint and seclusion, the risk of abuse is dramatically heightened.

The alternative, positive behavioral intervention and support (see http://www.pbis.org/) has been proven effective in school systems around the country. PBIS improves the school environment for all children.

The updated Rule 33 was created to help all people feel safe in Maine schools. I urge you to support its continued implementation and to support training programs for its effective implementation.

Thank you,

[your name and address]

---

Note: this was adapted from the Issue Brief found here: http://www.challengingbehavior.org/do/resources/documents/brief_preventing.pdf

Note: top priority contacts are members of the education committee:
Sen Rebecca Millett (D-Cumberland County) co-chair
SenRebecca.Millett@legislature.maine.gov
Sen Christopher Johnson (D-Lincoln County) chris@dirigo.net
Sen Brian Langley (R-Hancock County) langley4legislature@myfairpoint.net
Rep Bruce MacDonald (D-Boothbay) co-chair bmacdon@roadrunner.com
Rep Mary Pennell Nelson (D-Falmouth) mpn3@maine.rr.com
Rep Helen Rankin (D-Hiram) rankin8076@roadrunner.com
Rep Matthea Elisabeth Larsen Daughtry (D-Brunswick) mattie@mattiedaughtry.com
Rep Brian Hubbell (D-Bar Harbor) RepBrian.Hubbell@legislature.maine.gov
Rep Victoria Kornfield (D-Bangor) RepTori.Kornfield@legislature.maine.gov
Rep Peter Johnson (R-Greenville) rumridge27@gmail.com
Rep Joyce Maker (R-Calais) gjmaker@gmail.com
Rep Michael McClellan (R-Raymond) mmcclell@maine.rr.com
Rep Matthew Pouliot (R-Augusta) mpouliot57@gmail.com
Rep Madonna Soctomah (Passamaquoddy Tribe) Sipayik@midmaine.com

Retrieved from "http://wiki.laptop.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Sample_Maine_e-mail&oldid=279941"