Search results
Page title matches
- 30 bytes (3 words) - 09:49, 18 March 2007
- 21 bytes (2 words) - 23:56, 26 July 2007
Page text matches
- .... You can help us by either translating them into your native language or reviewing and correcting them.15 KB (2,389 words) - 06:30, 14 February 2009
- == Content Reviewing ==4 KB (526 words) - 11:45, 27 March 2012
- when a user wants it; Jon Corbet is reviewing the patch.121 KB (20,194 words) - 12:31, 1 June 2012
- * Feedback loop for reviewing the user experience -- how is a country's chosen language, keyboard, activi23 KB (3,443 words) - 16:31, 25 July 2013
- join us advocating for, and/or reviewing shortcomings of these proposals:30 KB (4,938 words) - 19:05, 8 January 2010
- join us advocating for, and/or reviewing shortcomings of these proposals: <CanoeBerry> Benji_Smith: great, please introduce us, reviewing your recent progress and where you're going next and this summer.22 KB (3,372 words) - 15:07, 23 April 2010
- ...ibuted community development of Sugar software and content, guidelines for reviewing and creating great material, and identification and assignment of open task22 KB (3,547 words) - 09:38, 26 April 2013
- ...by their individual contributions, and 20% would go to the Data Base, for reviewing costs.17 KB (2,791 words) - 07:42, 27 May 2010
- I spent the fireworks writing reports and reading code and reviewing scholarship apps. Happily, I could see them outside the window; reading ab751 bytes (125 words) - 11:44, 20 December 2009
- ...=5060 opening the kimono] with regard to the Sugar-XO User Interface (UI). Reviewing the UI docs starting to appear in this Wiki makes it manifest that the mesh12 KB (2,017 words) - 10:30, 21 December 2008
- On reviewing the .info structure, I am wondering why we don't have an *interface* versio9 KB (1,394 words) - 14:48, 9 April 2008
- {After reviewing recent much more detailed explanations in [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Power_10 KB (1,856 words) - 21:58, 12 May 2007
- join us advocating for, and/or reviewing shortcomings of these proposals: * christophd is reviewing atm33 KB (4,926 words) - 15:45, 20 August 2010
- join us advocating for and/or reviewing shortcomings of these proposals:23 KB (3,631 words) - 16:59, 28 August 2009
- ...r Peru jumping in—[[IRC]] #olpc-peru & #olpc-es). Translation wise, reviewing the [[:Category:Ongoing Translation]]s would be worthwhile (I know there ar6 KB (932 words) - 02:21, 17 September 2007
- ...cking the proliferation of projects, collections, and related efforts, and reviewing new submissions for quality and audience. Coordinators determine what conte12 KB (1,562 words) - 19:09, 13 January 2009
- 18:28 <|sj|> so if the collection of people reviewing and organizing our 18:31 <|sj|> mchua, if we actually start reviewing and organizing those needs22 KB (3,405 words) - 08:41, 25 March 2008
- ...cation here may confuse a designer trying to design for the system without reviewing the image for aspect reference.511 bytes (79 words) - 16:16, 10 March 2007
- * Non-intrusive -- reviewing should require no work on the part of the content provider. ...arrier to entry -- it should be easy for a new group of reviewers to start reviewing works and revising their internal system, without proving something about t6 KB (1,032 words) - 18:13, 28 February 2008
- As discussed on april 1 -- there is some reviewing that will be core; having an official developer program may mean announcing10 KB (1,712 words) - 01:47, 30 January 2008