{{peer-review-nav}}
...ntent not ready to be featured may need to go through explicit [[OLPC:peer review]] first. Activity authors and contributors should look at the [[OLPC:guide
2 KB (361 words) - 22:31, 20 August 2008
...iew]] and specific sister pages [[OLPC:project review]] and [[OLPC:website review]], could use guidelines for various types of pages and content — what
2 KB (254 words) - 09:52, 22 February 2009
Active learning discussions next week help review trials
[[OLPC:peer review|community review process]] for projects and more
14 KB (2,014 words) - 12:49, 13 September 2008
...ed content|Featured content]] · [[OLPC:Peer review|Peer review]] | [[OLPC:Brilliant pages|Brilliant wiki-pages]]
338 bytes (45 words) - 21:46, 18 August 2008
We need a process for general peer review of any proposal, overview, collection, project, website, or implementation
== submitting a page or project for peer review ==
1 KB (170 words) - 21:41, 13 February 2008
Ask a peer to review, or other people in #olpc-support-gang.
624 bytes (107 words) - 03:18, 11 February 2008
| [[Image:wiki-banner-4.gif|140px]] || [[OLPC:Peer review]] || from Gurch
1 KB (143 words) - 22:36, 13 February 2008
...ans in 1997. CPRS provides a single interface for health care providers to review and update a patient's medical record and to place orders, including medica
...r transmission to the National Quality Assurance Database for Headquarters review and tracking.
235 KB (33,830 words) - 10:15, 26 October 2011
* [[OLPC:PR]] - [[OLPC:Peer review|Peer review]]
...to [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Category:Pages_for_deletion deletion], peer review, or cleanup.)
2 KB (319 words) - 03:51, 17 December 2008
...lf-baked, untested, back-of-an-envelope stuff - no promises it works! Peer review, comments, feedback, or criticisms are all welcome.'''
12 KB (2,038 words) - 15:59, 3 July 2009
{{peer-review-nav}}
* User review and input : to discuss and review projects for brilliance, see [[OLPC:Featured content]].
5 KB (764 words) - 21:45, 18 August 2008
...here we can embark upon later-stage trials for feedback and polish. Please review the [[#Notes]] below and please report any new bugs to our trac system (See
* Improvements on jabber server for collaborating outside of the peer-to-peer mesh
18 KB (2,908 words) - 03:37, 6 August 2013
Articles for Review : assign articles to one of several metaprocesses:
* Peer review (neutrality, length, &c)
7 KB (1,148 words) - 10:31, 4 April 2008
| MIT Technology Review – [http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/20711/ $100 Laptop Program's N
| Taiwan Review - [http://taiwanreview.nat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xitem=30736&ctnode=1337&mp=1 Small
49 KB (6,846 words) - 11:33, 23 February 2012
| align="center" | MIT: Technology Review
...d para la Laptop de USD 100]]<span style="font-size:60%; "><br/>Technology Review: Security Model Released for the $100 Laptop</span>
34 KB (4,948 words) - 21:50, 3 May 2008
...econdly, preserving the original text in the translation may simplify peer review and help with maintenance.
...n category]] thus allowing other translators to find them and collaborate, review, make comments, etc. on them.
48 KB (7,312 words) - 22:23, 22 May 2011
...t: one good way to get someone else to review your proposal is to offer to review theirs in exchange). Refer to (and cite) sources from educational theory an
4 KB (558 words) - 17:23, 13 May 2008
...ess conference with Negroponte, Annan breaks the handle. Time for a design review."
...es pop out of the box, they will make a mesh network of their own, peer-to-peer. This is something initially developed at MIT and the Media Lab. We are als
35 KB (5,389 words) - 12:22, 1 June 2012
...j Ghimire of Bishwamitra assisting his colleague Kapil Gautam. The Peer-to-peer interaction has been amazing.
...d topics and gave some brief training and then left ample time for Peer-to-Peer interaction where the more advanced teachers trained others. Once a few tea
97 KB (16,717 words) - 14:08, 9 November 2010
* Fast Review of the 6 (was 5) latest (greatest!) HW/Project Proposals:
...got some UK people together for the meeting, but if you want more time to review, that'of course that's fine
30 KB (4,658 words) - 21:23, 2 July 2009
