User:Ixo/Project/Webcam: Difference between revisions

From OLPC
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (linked in new xawtv page)
Line 1: Line 1:
(per [[User:Sethwoodworth#Stop-motion]])
(per [[User:Sethwoodworth#Stop-motion]])
: I was just thinking of something similar the other day. "xoWebcam" -- Linux 'xawtv'/webcam package sugarized w/GUI. It's got frame capture capabilities built in, with total control of 'motion activated' and sequencing. Just need to find a good/lite package for putting frames into a movie format :-) ( 01:29, 16 January 2008 (EST))
: I was just thinking of something similar the other day. "xoWebcam" -- Linux '[[xawtv]]'/webcam package sugarized w/GUI. It's got frame capture capabilities built in, with total control of 'motion activated' and sequencing. Just need to find a good/lite package for putting frames into a movie format :-) ( 01:29, 16 January 2008 (EST))


Notes
Notes
* how difficult to install xawtv (footprint?)
* how difficult to install xawtv (footprint?)
: Note: Not difficult to install, see [[xawtv]] notes. -- 2/17/2008
* can call from Sugar ?
* can call from Sugar ?
* Put entries in crontab for capture ?
* Put entries in crontab for capture ?

Revision as of 04:51, 19 February 2008

(per User:Sethwoodworth#Stop-motion)

I was just thinking of something similar the other day. "xoWebcam" -- Linux 'xawtv'/webcam package sugarized w/GUI. It's got frame capture capabilities built in, with total control of 'motion activated' and sequencing. Just need to find a good/lite package for putting frames into a movie format :-) ( 01:29, 16 January 2008 (EST))

Notes

  • how difficult to install xawtv (footprint?)
Note: Not difficult to install, see xawtv notes. -- 2/17/2008
  • can call from Sugar ?
  • Put entries in crontab for capture ?
  • Can run it without Activity active ? (if so, what happens in conflict of Record?)